Hi Timo,
--On Tuesday, January 28, 2003 01:38:04 AM +0200 Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| So, what about the UIDVALIDITY notify? I like that, it breaks nothing
| and would allow clients supporting it to keep their message cache.
|
| x RENAME foo bar
| x OK [NEW-UIDVALIDITY 123456] Renamed.
|
| If foo had children mailboxes, they'd all be updated to contain the same
| UIDVALIDITY.
The only caveat is for servers that do not use timestamps for UIDVALIDITY.
In that case those servers would have to ensure that the new UIDVALIDITY is
greater than any UIDVALIDITY for mailboxes that may have previously existed
with any of the new names.
--
Cyrus Daboo
- RENAME, once more Timo Sirainen
- Re: RENAME, once more Cyrus Daboo
- Re: RENAME, once more Mark Crispin
- Re: RENAME, once more Timo Sirainen
- Re: RENAME, once more Cyrus Daboo
- Re: RENAME, once more Timo Sirainen
- Re: RENAME, once more Mark Keasling
- Re: RENAME, once more Mark Crispin
- Re: RENAME, once more Mark Keasling
- Re: RENAME, once more Timo Sirainen
- Re: RENAME, once more Mark Keasling
- Re: RENAME, once more Timo Sirainen
