Re: RENAME, once more

[Cyrus Daboo]

Hi Mark,

--On Thursday, January 30, 2003 3:29 PM +0900 Mark Keasling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

| All that would be necessary (famous last words) is one additional untagged
| response to select and examine. Implementing it; however, may very well

That's not all that is necessary. First clients need a way to discover the name of a mailbox with an associated ID. Second, it would be more useful if commands that currently take mailbox names could be modified to take mailbox IDs so disconnected client could avoid worrying about the id<->name mapping at all.

--
Cyrus Daboo