On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 17:03, Mark Crispin wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jun 2003, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > others evidently just went ahead and _used_ the
> > \Unmarked flag even though it's completely irrelevant to them.
>
> How did you arrive at that conclusion?
>
> What "others" used \Unmarked without understanding what it means?
My 'others' I mean the authors of the clients which Richard tested prior
to saying, in the paragraph which I quoted in my own reply,
"This is because when I was testing with multiple concurrent
connected clients (as I like to work) it screwed up the new
message counts."
Perhaps I misinterpreted him, and his 'multiple concurrent connected
clients' was in fact just multiple copies of the _same_ client, and
hence there was only _one_ such buggy client.
Given the ease with which this particular mistake can be made, however,
I suspect the plural is correct.
--
dwmw2
