On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 22:37, Mark Crispin wrote: > On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Ken Murchison wrote: > > What is the meaning of BINARY[]? > > I think that it should be a syntax error, but unfortunately the > section-binary rule in RFC 3516 is: > section-binary = "[" [section-part] "]" > instead of: > section-binary = "[" section-part "]" > > I consider this to be a bug in RFC 3516. If it intended to make BINARY[] > valid, it should have used the RFC 3501 "section" rule.
Fetching BINARY[..] for message/rfc822 body part has the same problem.
