On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 10:30, Paul Jarc wrote: > Michael Wener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > My consideration at the moment is only coordinated sessions. Sessions > > that are aware of each others logic and are behaving in concert. > > The server has no way of knowing whether two sessions are coordinated > on the client side. It has to treat each session independently. In > the case of IMAP, this means, among other things, that the server > maintains a per-session mapping between messages and message sequence > numbers. Consequently, message sequence numbers are not meaningful to
Ah ... I see. Does the server keep a per-session mapping between messages and UIDs? Mike
