On Friday, October 3, 2003, 09:47:34, Len Conrad wrote: > ... > the CNAME of course should pose no problem, since CNAMEs are recommended in > RFC 2317 for classless reverse delegation for smaller-than-ClassC subnets.
There was the CNAME problem with BIND 4.9.3-BETA resolver but its hard
to believe anybody would still be running that.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"A wise moral is hard to find
but a chicken lays an egg only once."
