M.D. DeWar wrote: > Curious why not use > zombies > misc
I just added that one to see how it goes. > spam spam was blocking too many legit smarthosts. > block > or the two rhsbl ones > badconf > nomail ? For the others, I didn't want to do that many queries for an email. I'm going to use spfilter to make local maps of those and possibly the ones I'm currently querying if they aren't too large. > > Thanks > Mark > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chris Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 10:17 AM > Subject: [IMGate] sorbs dnsbl experiences > > > >>I started using the main dnsbl.sorbs.net zone this morning to replace the >>easynet.nl zones that are going away. That zone had some false positives >>from smarthosts for twtelecom and durocomm (two common ISPs in this area). >>After seeing that I started using their subzones and didn't use the >>spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net which was the one blocking the valid smarthosts > > above. > >>So far so good. I'm using the following and haven't seen any false >>positives (although they have only been running for a couple hours and all >>blocks have been from dul): >> >>dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net >>http.dnsbl.sorbs.net >>socks.dnsbl.sorbs.net >>smtp.dnsbl.sorbs.net >>web.dnsbl.sorbs.net >> >>Note that dul now includes the easynet dynablock zone. The full list of >>zones is at the bottom of this page: >>http://www.dnsbl.au.sorbs.net/using.html >> >>-- >>Chris Scott >>Host Orlando, Inc >>http://www.hostorlando.com/ >> >> >> > > > > -- Chris Scott Host Orlando, Inc http://www.hostorlando.com/
