Make sure you put dul at the top, it eliminated the most for me, in = fact, it made the rest pretty much useless.
The only ones that caught anything after dul is the spam zone, and = sometimes the http. You don't want to use everything to lessen bandwidth and cpu load, and = more importantly false positives. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] = On Behalf Of M.D. DeWar Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 7:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [IMGate] Re: sorbs dnsbl experiences Curious why not use zombies misc spam block or the two rhsbl ones badconf nomail ? Thanks Mark ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "Chris Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 10:17 AM Subject: [IMGate] sorbs dnsbl experiences > > I started using the main dnsbl.sorbs.net zone this morning to replace = the > easynet.nl zones that are going away. That zone had some false = positives > from smarthosts for twtelecom and durocomm (two common ISPs in this = area). > After seeing that I started using their subzones and didn't use the > spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net which was the one blocking the valid smarthosts above. > > So far so good. I'm using the following and haven't seen any false > positives (although they have only been running for a couple hours and = all > blocks have been from dul): > > dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net > http.dnsbl.sorbs.net > socks.dnsbl.sorbs.net > smtp.dnsbl.sorbs.net > web.dnsbl.sorbs.net > > Note that dul now includes the easynet dynablock zone. The full list = of > zones is at the bottom of this page: > http://www.dnsbl.au.sorbs.net/using.html > > --=20 > Chris Scott > Host Orlando, Inc > http://www.hostorlando.com/ > > >
