On 12/2/13 12:42 PM, Andrew Guertin wrote: > > I currently have boundary=administrative on the relations representing > each town, and nothing on the member ways. There doesn't seem to be > complete consensus on whether member ways should also be marked > boundary=administrative, with it being inconsistently applied in the > areas of neighboring states I checked. I decided to not duplicate the > information. > i think it's on the ways mostly due to the 2008 TIGER places import. i'm removing them from ways when i see them, and the way is included in well formed adminstrative boundary relations.
richard
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
