On 12/2/13 2:13 PM, Paul Norman wrote: >> From: Andrew Guertin [mailto:[email protected]] >> Subject: Re: [Imports] Vermont Town boundaries from VCGI >> >> I currently have boundary=administrative on the relations representing >> each town, and nothing on the member ways. There doesn't seem to be >> complete consensus on whether member ways should also be marked >> boundary=administrative, with it being inconsistently applied in the >> areas of neighboring states I checked. I decided to not duplicate the >> information. > The rule is to have boundary=administrative on the member ways with the > numerically lowest admin_level of any of its relations. > ok i can go with that. but most of what i'm seeing does the opposite, i'm seeing lots of admin_level=8 tags on ways that are part of higher level boundaries.
richard
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
