malenki wrote on Fri, 13 Jun 2014 22:09:55 +0200: > malenki wrote on Wed, 11 Jun 2014 16:50:05 +0200: > > > Am Wed, 28 May 2014 23:16:56 +0200 > > schrieb malenki <[email protected]>: > > > > > Has anyone objections for removing water=lake;pond and also the > > > other proprietary data? > > > > My conclusion to the discussion: I won't do anything since only > > a minority agrees to do anything at all (if even). > > Since it seems after saying the above some more people meant it > wouldn't hurt too much do remove at least the "water=lake;pond" > I will do that now.
I am done; due to some conflicts (a user surveyed some TIGER and other data meanwhile) and timeouts there are three changesets: http://www.osm.org/changeset/22917492 http://www.osm.org/changeset/22920297 http://www.osm.org/changeset/22921689 Some selected pieces of data which show the quality of imports and also the usefulness of all the IDs for comparing when new data is imported: identical ways with same timestamp imported thrice in half a year: https://www.osm.org/#map=21/35.1426049/-113.6415879 identical ways, different timestamps, imported twice in seven minutes: https://www.osm.org/#map=20/36.5903/-119.235499 https://www.osm.org/#map=20/37.134396/-120.006703 And a reservoir as MP with natural=water as inner ways: https://www.osm.org/#map=16/37.29683/-120.14636 natural=water with building=yes and full address: https://www.osm.org/way/48511080 It seems due to the "good example" of mapping water bodies with water=lake;pond some mappers of a region where that import and "fix" occurred were inspired to tag water bodies like this. Nearly 500 "water=lake;pond" show up around here in a area of 100x120 km: https://www.osm.org/#map=9/35.348/-120.368 _______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
