On Wednesday 11 June 2014, Dan S wrote: > > That's certainly a valid decision to take. It's a shame though! > > The most important core of your idea was remove the poorly > double-tagged "water=lake;pond" tags that user "WorstFixer" added > blindly. That's quite a precise fix that would improve data quality > IMHO. I didn't see majority opposition to that.
Well - i was the one who opposed the removal but i also made suggestions how to maintain the useful information in there while avoiding the ugly double tag. -- Christoph Hormann http://www.imagico.de/ _______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
