Am Wed, 11 Jun 2014 18:00:59 +0200 schrieb Christoph Hormann <[email protected]>:
> On Wednesday 11 June 2014, Dan S wrote: > > > > That's certainly a valid decision to take. It's a shame though! > > > > The most important core of your idea was remove the poorly > > double-tagged "water=lake;pond" tags that user "WorstFixer" added > > blindly. That's quite a precise fix that would improve data quality > > IMHO. I didn't see majority opposition to that. > > Well - i was the one who opposed the removal but i also made > suggestions how to maintain the useful information in there while > avoiding the ugly double tag. I won't use a tag which I don't consider useful. For me it is: waterway=* == flowing water natural=water == not flowing (though the most waterbodies have some current) _______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
