Am 29.12.2017 um 21:47 schrieb Rafael Avila Coya:
The rule is that each segment should have as admin_level the highest
level of all the admin divisions it belongs to.
I don't see this rule documented in
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:admin_level
Can you please add it there? Also, JOSM did not warn me about the
missing admin_level.
Although a bit off-topic, I have seen that all boundaries in Switzerland
need some corrections. When looking at level 9 entities, I checked for
example Jorat-Menthue (admin_level=8), in District du Gros-de-Vaud (6),
Canton of Vaud, that is divided in 5 admin_level=9 entities. I saw that
this Jorat-Menthue is duplicated (2 relations) [2]. > It would be nice
that an experienced user of the Swiss OSM community has a check
nation-wide to correct this and other errors.
What other errors do you see? Can you tell me an Overpass query that
your insights are based on?
Johannes
_______________________________________________
Imports mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
