Hi, Johannes:
On 30/12/17 10:14, Johannes Singler wrote:
Am 29.12.2017 um 21:47 schrieb Rafael Avila Coya:
The rule is that each segment should have as admin_level the highest
level of all the admin divisions it belongs to.
I don't see this rule documented in
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:admin_level
Can you please add it there? Also, JOSM did not warn me about the
missing admin_level.
It is documented here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary
Although a bit off-topic, I have seen that all boundaries in
Switzerland need some corrections. When looking at level 9 entities, I
checked for example Jorat-Menthue (admin_level=8), in District du
Gros-de-Vaud (6), Canton of Vaud, that is divided in 5 admin_level=9
entities. I saw that this Jorat-Menthue is duplicated (2 relations)
[2]. > It would be nice
that an experienced user of the Swiss OSM community has a check
nation-wide to correct this and other errors.
What other errors do you see? Can you tell me an Overpass query that
your insights are based on?
Sorry: I wanted to say "... to correct this and other **possible**
errors...".
As I was just looking for an example of admin_level=9 administrative
divisions and I found that duplicate example, I find it quite probable
that there might be other mistakes here and there. It's only a guess,
and in any case I am quite sure this happens with mostly all countries.
Sometimes errors come from newbies who don't know really how to handle a
boundary relation.
The overpass to download all administrative boundaries of Switzerland
that I used is:
[timeout:150];
(
node["boundary"="administrative"](area:3600051701);
way["boundary"="administrative"](area:3600051701);
relation["boundary"="administrative"](area:3600051701);
);
out meta;
>;
out meta;
Running the JOSM validator I can give you some error examples:
1. Heimiswil [1] in Canton Bern has 470 duplicated nodes.
2. Bonfol [2] and Vendlincourt [3] nodes, that are duplicated as members
of their respective relations with label and admin_centre roles.
3. Zürich airport area [4] is tagged as boundary=administrative, and
crossing the boundaries it finds on its way.
4. Apart of Zürich airport, there are other 4 boundary=administrative
segments around Switzerland without the admin_level tag. One exemple is
this one [5], that belongs to 2 admin_level=6 entities, 2 admin_level=8,
1 admin_level=9 and 1 admin_level=10.
The rest of the errors, like 25 unclosed boundaries, you can get them
from the JOSM validator.
Cheers,
Rafael.
[1] http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1682474
[2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/419894895
[3] https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/419894893
[4] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463409859
[5] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/122946544
Johannes
_______________________________________________
Imports mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
_______________________________________________
Imports mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
