Dear Rafael and Andreas, Thank you for taking the time to review the import plan and for you recommendations, which are helpful. Here are a few comments:
1) Architect: Yes, we can remove "ukjent" (unknown) as it does not provide any additional information. The "type" in "Linstow type" usually means that the building was based on a general plan for a church of this size by architect Linstow, perhaps used for more than one church. Will check. The place name in architecht="Ole Halvorsen, Bergen" usually means that there are more than one architect with the same name. Will check. We will review the list of architects before the import. 2) Languages: There is already a description in the work flow section of the import plan on how to handle multiple names for a church. Existing names will be kept. The N50 background map will show the official/primary name, including Norwegian and Sami names where both are required (including the correct order). We can expand the workflow section and make it even clearer. 3) History: The history should be kept. Will add that to the workflow description. 4) Building footprint: Aerials will aid in deciding which building footprint is the best to keep. Will add that to the workflow description, including a warning against altering buildings with 3D tags. The quality of the footprint in the import is high. 5) End_date: Some of the churches with an end_date has now a different function. We can remove them from the import as they are not important buildings anymore in this context. Others with an end_date have burnt down and are now ruins. 6) Ruins: There seems to be different views on how to tag a ruin (as reflected on the wiki discussion pages), and we are in fact unable to conclude which tagging is recommended in OSM based on the wiki. On 28/01/2018 19:50, Tor wrote: > 28. jan. 2018 kl. 03:30 skrev Rafael Avila Coya <[email protected]>: >> >> 2) -42440 (Valjok kirke): >> >> This church already mapped has two name tags in OSM: >> >> "name"="Valjok kirke" >> "name:se"="Váljohka girkko" -> name in Sami language >> >> In this case, would you add the Sami name to the name tag? >> In general, what will be the sintax when you add both names to the name tag, >> so all users use a consistent naming? Will it be "Valjok kirke - Váljohka >> girkko", "Valjok kirke / Váljohka girkko", "Valjok kirke;Váljohka girkko"…? > I don’t think it has been discussed thoroughly, but the practice in Norway > seems to be to use only one name/language in the name=* tag. > > If the church is located inside “samisk forvaltningsområde” (≈ “Sami > administrative area”), the Sami name should probably be used in the name=* > tag, and the Norwegian name added as name:no=*. Sami language has official > status in the municipalities that make up “samisk forvaltningsområde”. These > are the municipalities: > > Unjárga – Nesseby > Deatnu – Tana > Porsanger – Porsáŋgu – Porsanki > Kárášjohka – Karasjok > Guovdageaidnu – Kautokeino > Gáivuotna – Kåfjord – Kaivuono > Loabák – Lavangen > Divtasvuodna – Tysfjord > Aarporte – Hattfjelldal > Raarvihke – Røyrvik > Snåase – Snåsa > > >> 4) -42800 (Bø kyrkje): >> >> "name"="Bø kyrkje" -> But the wiki isn't clear on what you will do when it >> is already mapped with a different name. In this case, the name in OSM is >> "By kyrkje", so which one will you keep if names are different? > In this particular case the name in OSM is wrong. It should be name=Bø kyrkje. > > For churches with more than one genuine name, instructions are given on the > wiki: “Some churches have more than one name. The name used on the N50 map > will be used in the name tag; others will be kept in the alt_name tag.” > >> The church is also mapped as an area (building footprint). But the wiki >> doesn't clarify what footprint will remain, if the one present in OSM or the >> new one from the import. > The building outlines in this data set are generally of high quality and > better than the hand drawn ones in OSM. Before replacing them however, they > should be double checked against other sources (aerial/satellite imagery or > N50 map). > > >> "architect"="ukjent" -> ukjent means unknown, isn't it? I guess in this case >> it would be better to skip the architect tag, or change it to >> "architect"="unknown", although it seems there isn't any object in OSM with >> the "architect"="unknown" key&value combination according to taginfo [3]. >> I've checked, and there are 266 churches with this "architect"="ukjent" tag. > The architect=* tag should be deleted for these 266 churches. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Imports mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports > _______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
