Hi, Andreas:
Thank you for your answer. Now it's clear to me.
Cheers,
Rafael.
On 29/01/18 00:23, Andreas Vilén wrote:
The building tag is used to show what kind of building it is, not its
usage. ”A building that was built as a church” and so on in the
descriptions of the values.
This does not contradict your point as that speaks about usage.
For instance this is now a museum, but clearly for many years was used
as a church: https://sv.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sankt_Ibbs_nya_kyrka
/Andreas
Skickat från min iPhone
28 jan. 2018 kl. 21:21 skrev Rafael Avila Coya <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>:
Hi, Andreas:
I can't find what you say about buildings in the key:building wiki.
In any case, the life cycle wiki contradicts that:
The date namespace can be added to any tag to indicate a period of
validity for the tag.
key:date-date = value
key:date--date = value
key:date- = value
key:-date = value
It says to any tag.
Which one should we follow then?
Cheers,
Rafael.
On 28/01/18 08:59, Andreas Vilén wrote:
”If a church was a church and is not a church anymore (it is a
community centre, for example), it can't be building=church. Let's
say the church was constructed in 1780 and ended as church in 1978,
and now is a community centre. In that case it should be
"building:1780-1978"="church", "amenity:1780-1978"="place_of_worship"”
No, the wiki clearly states that the building tag is used for what
the building was built as. A building built as a church will always
be building=church no matter the usage.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building
/Andreas
Skickat från min iPhone
28 jan. 2018 kl. 03:30 skrev Rafael Avila Coya <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>>:
_______________________________________________
Imports mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
