Thank you for your comments. This is very helpful. Please see short comments below.
2018-03-12 17:12 GMT+01:00 Michael Reichert <osm...@michreichert.de>: > > Could you please use construction:railway=* in addition to > railway=construction? The same applies to disused, abandoned and razed tracks. > Ok, got it. > Your import page mentions railway=razed. Are you aware that some > community members think that overbuilt railway lines shouldn't be mapped > in OSM? > Yes. These razed/abandoned tracks have been in OSM for many years now in Norway but so far with no objections. Will keep this in mind. I believe no new razed tracks will be introduced with the import. The existing razed/abandoned tracks belong to relations for historic railways and are used for the live OSM maps in Wikipedia. Example: https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treungenbanen > If the name tag of a railway line is just the concatenation of two > station/place names, it shouldn't be added. name=* is reserved for real > names and some features don't have names. > I believe all names are real, typically "Bergensbanen" and similar. Will check a few sidings. > > Your comments are welcome. The import plan will also be sent to the > > Openrailway mailing list. > > I have not received an email from that mailing list. You have to be > subscribed to that list to send emails to it. > I registered with the Openrailway mailing list on 7 March (and a couple of times after that) but so far I have not been approved, so unfortunately I have been unable to send the import plan to that mailing list.
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list Imports@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports