And here are 3 more suburbs of address data around the Epping region for
review. Same approach as in the past, if no issues raised in 2 weeks I will
upload.
https://gitlab.com/dionmoult/osm-nsw-address-import/blob/master/review/NORTH-EPPING.osm
https://gitlab.com/dionmoult/osm-nsw-address-import/blob/master/review/CHELTENHAM.osm
https://gitlab.com/dionmoult/osm-nsw-address-import/blob/master/review/BEECROFT.osm
Any strange nodes in the same place that require more debate / manual survey
have been placed in the FOR-MANUAL-REVIEW dataset for the future:
https://gitlab.com/dionmoult/osm-nsw-address-import/blob/master/review/FOR-MANUAL-REVIEW.osm
Dion Moult
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On August 4, 2018 10:04 PM, Dion Moult <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks for all the feedback! It's good to know what options are out there. In
> the interest of conservative imports, and to not hold back to the rest of the
> import, I will follow Eliot's suggestion in what they did in New Zealand.
> Here is the revised EPPING-3.osm dataset which should be very straightforward
> and shouldn't have any issues. As usual if there are no objections in 2 weeks
> I will upload.
>
> https://gitlab.com/dionmoult/osm-nsw-address-import/blob/master/review/EPPING-3.osm
>
> If there are three or less nodes in the same place, I have reviewed them all
> manually and displaced them slightly, exactly what I have done in EPPING-1
> and EPPING-2, and what they did in New Zealand.
>
> If there are four or more nodes in the same place, I have put it in another
> dataset called FOR-MANUAL-REVIEW. We will leave this to a later update, and I
> will personally do some surveying and will post my discoveries and
> suggestions on how to map it in another thread in the future.
>
> https://gitlab.com/dionmoult/osm-nsw-address-import/blob/master/review/FOR-MANUAL-REVIEW.osm
>
> Dion Moult
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On August 4, 2018 9:31 PM, Andrew Harvey <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 4 August 2018 at 21:27, Andrew Harvey <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I think what is valuable in the apartment case is how many units are there
>>> in this building, but not sure if there is an existing tag for that.
>>
>> The tag for this is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:flats,
>> "number of residential units (flats, apartments) in an apartment building".
>>
>> I also agree that the addr:flats can be used to list out all the unit
>> numbers in the apartment complex.
_______________________________________________
Imports mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
