Just a notification that there are 4 more suburbs ready for review. Same
conservative approach taken as before.
https://gitlab.com/dionmoult/osm-nsw-address-import/blob/master/review/CARLINGFORD.osm
https://gitlab.com/dionmoult/osm-nsw-address-import/blob/master/review/EASTWOOD.osm
https://gitlab.com/dionmoult/osm-nsw-address-import/blob/master/review/MARSFIELD.osm
https://gitlab.com/dionmoult/osm-nsw-address-import/blob/master/review/TELOPEA.osm
Any confusing nodes have been set aside into the FOR-MANUAL-REVIEW dataset:
https://gitlab.com/dionmoult/osm-nsw-address-import/blob/master/review/FOR-MANUAL-REVIEW.osm
Dion Moult
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On August 5, 2018 12:43 PM, Dion Moult <[email protected]> wrote:
> Absolutely correct. That's why instead of trying to guess and resolve it I
> have moved it to a separate dataset. I will do a manual survey and open a
> separate thread to discuss my findings in the future.
>
> Sent from ProtonMail mobile
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> On 5 Aug. 2018, 8:42 am, Andrew Harvey < [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 5 August 2018 at 01:45, Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> It would be good to know what the actual situation is. Maybe this is one
>>> entrance which leads to all those addresses (e.g. apartments), maybe it is
>>> some simplification and you could create better locations than all on (or
>>> close to) one point? Do you have the possibility to visit some of these for
>>> ground survey?
>>
>> There's not going to be a single answer here, it's going to vary by location
>> (although it's likely to be one of a few scenarios you mentioned).
>> Ultimately it's always going to be more accurate representation of what's on
>> the group by surveying it.
_______________________________________________
Imports mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
