Thanks for all the feedback! It's good to know what options are out there. In
the interest of conservative imports, and to not hold back to the rest of the
import, I will follow Eliot's suggestion in what they did in New Zealand. Here
is the revised EPPING-3.osm dataset which should be very straightforward and
shouldn't have any issues. As usual if there are no objections in 2 weeks I
will upload.
https://gitlab.com/dionmoult/osm-nsw-address-import/blob/master/review/EPPING-3.osm
If there are three or less nodes in the same place, I have reviewed them all
manually and displaced them slightly, exactly what I have done in EPPING-1 and
EPPING-2, and what they did in New Zealand.
If there are four or more nodes in the same place, I have put it in another
dataset called FOR-MANUAL-REVIEW. We will leave this to a later update, and I
will personally do some surveying and will post my discoveries and suggestions
on how to map it in another thread in the future.
https://gitlab.com/dionmoult/osm-nsw-address-import/blob/master/review/FOR-MANUAL-REVIEW.osm
Dion Moult
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On August 4, 2018 9:31 PM, Andrew Harvey <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 4 August 2018 at 21:27, Andrew Harvey <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I think what is valuable in the apartment case is how many units are there
>> in this building, but not sure if there is an existing tag for that.
>
> The tag for this is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:flats,
> "number of residential units (flats, apartments) in an apartment building".
>
> I also agree that the addr:flats can be used to list out all the unit numbers
> in the apartment complex.
_______________________________________________
Imports mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
