So, how do we label the results of our results that gave us the significance of this tag sequence?
I am really curious and I would love to know how best we can work around it. Thank you! Stellamaris On Sun, Nov 6, 2022 at 8:36 PM Mike Thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2022 at 6:19 PM Stellamaris Nakacwa <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hello Phil, >> >> We were able to make a thorough assessment of the key/value pair of all >> water tags, based on granularity, compliance, consistency and completeness >> (temporal and spatial coverage) and what is written in my osm wiki is the >> most significant outcome of the assessment. --a snippet is attached too. >> Also, I personally believe that uploading data to osm (esp. for LIC) >> should not just be for the sake of uploads but to make real data >> contributions that those governing institutions and interested parties can >> rely on to make desired planning progress. In verbatim, I believe that all >> infrastructure is man-made. That is why for springs, we only mapped ones >> that have been well-built and cared for. >> > Regardless if a spring is tagged natural=spring, the name=* tag is only > for the name of the feature, not for descriptive information. Also, the > name tag is not a way to cause the renderer to create a desired label that > would otherwise not appear, that is tagging for the renderer. > > However, regarding springs, in my opinion, springs are inherently > natural. If there is human made infrastructure associated with the spring, > separate tags should be found for that infrastructure, or perhaps it should > be mapped separately. Take the example of a lake where humans have > extensively modified the shoreline, we still tag the lake as natural=water. > > Mike > >> >>
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
