Sure! I will be attaching them as they come in per dates. However, you can use the sample to tease out all thoughts.
Thank you! Stellamaris On Tue, Nov 22, 2022, 11:15 AM Mike Thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Stellamaris, > > The community needs to have access to all of the data in the format that > you intend to import so that we can review it, especially given the issues > so far with this dataset. > > BTW, there is no GeoJSON file in the repository[0] that I am seeing, only > the .csv and the .osm file. > > Mike > > [0] https://github.com/StellaWava/U-WIMP-OSM-DATA > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 8:53 AM Stellamaris Nakacwa <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Oh! Sorry Mike, >> >> The csv is the initial dataset. The .geojson is the well validated >> dataset sample. >> >> Stellamaris >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022, 10:45 AM Mike Thompson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hello Stellamaris, >>> >>> Thanks, I downloaded the current data. >>> >>> Some initial thoughts: >>> * The CSV file has 570 points but the OSM file only has 93, why? >>> * The OSM file contains a county=* tag. As OSM is a spatial database, >>> it is not necessary to indicate the county in which a feature is within. >>> * Nevertheless, if for some reason you need to include the county in the >>> data (you will need a strong case for doing this), you should probably put >>> the value in title case. Currently all points are tagged as county=aswa >>> * The OSM file contains tags for latitude and longitude, as a spatial >>> database, this is not necessary and is redundant. These should be removed. >>> >>> In general, while there have been some good changes to the data, there >>> have also been some changes that have made the data worse (I don't recall >>> latitude and longitude being in the previous data). >>> >>> I will try to get some more time to review later, I have noticed some >>> other strange things about this data, but need to research further. >>> >>> Mike >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 8:21 AM Stellamaris Nakacwa <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello Mike, >>>> The link to the data is within the document... Under current status. >>>> >>>> Thank you! >>>> >>>> Stellamaris >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022, 10:08 AM Mike Thompson <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello Sellamaris, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for providing us with the link to the documentation. Have you >>>>> made the corrections to the data that were previously suggested? Can we >>>>> have access to the corrected data? >>>>> >>>>> First thought on the documentation is that you need to be more >>>>> specific. For example, while doing the import, are you going to be >>>>> reviewing it against existing OSM data? If the point being imported is on >>>>> top of a building in the data, but the associated photo indicates that it >>>>> is not in fact on top of a building are you going to adjust the location >>>>> of >>>>> the building, the point, or are you not going to make an adjustment? >>>>> >>>>> Mike >>>>> >>>>> Mike >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 7:02 PM Stellamaris Nakacwa < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Safe Greetings All, >>>>>> >>>>>> Here is the documentation >>>>>> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Imports_Uganda_Water_Infrastructure_Mapping_Project#Current_Status> >>>>>> for the U-WIMP import. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you! >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> Stellamaris >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 12:19 PM Stellamaris Nakacwa < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you! I will refer the latter to the first thread of this >>>>>>> conversation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Stellamaris >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 6:59 PM Martin Koppenhoefer < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> sent from a phone >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> > On 10 Nov 2022, at 00:36, Mike Thompson <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > If they are truly on top of the building in reality, then they >>>>>>>> should be on top of the buildings on the map, however, the ones I saw >>>>>>>> were >>>>>>>> not on top of the buildings in reality (based upon the photos that the >>>>>>>> data >>>>>>>> linked to) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> for features on buildings it is helpful to add location=rooftop as >>>>>>>> well >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Imports mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports >>>>>> >>>>>
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
