I will evaluate Mercury and EMWAC... Mercury seems to be more complete, but more instable. I'm looking for stability... 8 years is a great time!! Congratulations.
Anyone more have an opinion??
thanks...
| De: | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| Para: | [email protected] |
| Cópia: |
| Data: | Tue, 2 Mar 2004 18:53:59 +0100 |
| Assunto: | Re: Best software |
> Hello Daniel,
>
> I'm also a small isp in France, and I've been using IMS for 8 years, it has carried over millions of mails (and billions spams)
> Since then I've run other mail servers on linux platforms, but the IMS server is still here.
>
> It is simple and easy to use, and well integrated with NT or Windows 2000 user list
>
> There are talented programmers who still maintain the necessary pieces of the puzzle.
>
> The only difficulty is that you will have to go pick here and there excellent and necessary complement software, (such as antirelay, antispam, etc)
>
> There were discussions a few months ago to set up a repository where we could find everything in one place, but it has not been done yet.
>
> I have not experienced other mail servers on windows platforms
>
> Whatever your final choice is, I would be interested to know what you decided
>
> Benoit
>
>
----- Original Message -----To: imsusersSent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 6:32 PMSubject: Best software>> Hello...>> My name is Daniel and I'm from São Paulo, SP, Brazil.> I'm currently supporting a small local ISP.>>>>> Mercury/32 or EMWAC IMS.>> Which e-mail server software is better?> And webmail, Anyone knows a good software to recommend??>> Thanks>> Daniel>>
