> > Could recognition of the whitelist by the spam trap code be added? > > It wouldn't be difficult. > > But in your case (and mine, with receivers in front of ims) spam trap is > not worth bothering with.
In my case (and I assume Alan's) 99% of my mail comes straight from the sending server to my primary MX server (IMS) only in the 1% where the IMS server is too busy or down does the mail go to my secondary MX and waits for IMS to come up or get un-busy. So if in that 1% there's a spam trap address I may temporarily black list my own secondary MX. Whitelisting the secondary MX would keep me from ignoring him for just doing his job of stepping in when needed. Don DeCosta This is the discussion list for the IMS Free email server software. To unsubscribe send mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered by Rockliffe MailSite http://www.rockliffe.com/mailsite Rock Solid Software (tm)
