Hi Werner, Like Wayne said, before producing a milestone release, or even checking in the code, the IP team need to grant checkin approval. It does not seem to be the case yet for the CQs you are referring to.
Benjamin De : <[email protected]> on behalf of Werner Keil <[email protected]> Répondre à : Discussions for new Eclipse projects <[email protected]> Date : mardi 22 mars 2016 12:28 À : <[email protected]> Cc : <[email protected]> Objet : Re: [incubation] Interim Release with Open CQs > Hi Wayne, > > Thanks for sharing. Guess it also means, incubating UoMo can do a branch or > even Milestone release using JSR 363 till the 2 new CQs by SmartHome > https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10855 > https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10854 > are through?;-) > > Werner > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. März 2016 um 04:05 Uhr > Von: "Wayne Beaton" <[email protected]> > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [incubation] Interim Release with Open CQs > Hi Christopher. > > Projects can do releases while in incubation. > > All CQs for code/libraries that are included in the release bits must be > closed/approved by the IP Team prior to the release. > > In the time leading up to the release, you can and should distribute milestone > builds that includes code/libraries that the IP team has granted checkin > approval for. These are not official releases, and should be annotated as such > (e.g. 0.7M2). > > I recommend that the Science Working Group make a master list of all the open > CQs that are required for the coordinated autumn release that we can present > to the IP Team along with your last question. This should be a relatively easy > query if we have a list of participating projects. Giving the IP Team a clear > picture of what needs to be accomplished is the best way of getting that > question answered. > > By way of background for those readers who are not involved in the Science > Working Group's communications: several of the Science projects have decided > to do a coordinated release in the fall (along the lines of what the Planning > Council does with the Simultaneous Release) > > HTH, > > Wayne > > On 21/03/16 07:04 PM, Christopher Brooks wrote: >> Triquetrum is using the Parallel IP Process. >> >> We have open CQs for third party material: >> >>> https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10439 - diva >>> https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10440 - ptolemy.actor.gui >>> https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10441 - ptolemy.actor.lib >>> https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10442 - ptolemy.core >>> https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10443 - ptolemy.sdf >>> https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10444 - ptolemy.gui >>> https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10445 - ptolemy.moml >>> https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10446 - org.ptolemy.commons >>> https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10856 - >>> ptolemy.domains.process >> >> We would like to participate in the Science/Industry Working Group Autumn >> 2016 release, which is scheduled for October 21, 2016. >> >> Can do an interim release with open CQs while remaining in incubation? >> >> https://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/HOWTO/Incubation_Phase says: >> >>> * Interim Releases. Incubation Phase projects may make releases. All major >>> and minor releases must go through a Release Review >>> <http://www.eclipse.org/projects/dev_process/release-review.php> . >> https://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/HOWTO/Release_Reviews says: >> >>> Intellectual Property >>> Before you can consider a Release Review, all of the relevant CQs must be >>> approved by the Eclipse Legal team. We cannot schedule a Review before the >>> Legal team has completed their work. If you are waiting for CQs, please >>> review where your CQs are, and when they are scheduled to be reviewed, in >>> the IP team work queue >>> <https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem&remaction=run&nam >>> edcmd=IP%20Team%20Work%20Queue&sharer_id=854> . >> >> The above indicates to me that we need to have the CQs approved before >> release review. Does approved mean closed? >> >> If we need to have these CQs closed, is it feasible to have them closed by >> the end of September so that we can schedule a release review? >> >> Thanks, >> >> _Christopher >> >> -- >> Christopher Brooks, PMP University of California >> Academic Program Manager & Software Engineer US Mail: 337 Cory Hall >> CHESS/iCyPhy/Ptolemy/TerraSwarm Berkeley, CA 94720-1774 >> [email protected], 707.332.0670 (Office: 545Q Cory) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> incubation mailing list >> [email protected] >> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from >> this list, visit >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation > > -- > Wayne Beaton > @waynebeaton > The Eclipse Foundation > <http://www.eclipsecon.org/france2016> > _______________________________________________ incubation mailing list > [email protected] To change your delivery options, retrieve your > password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation > _______________________________________________ incubation mailing list > [email protected] To change your delivery options, retrieve your > password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation
_______________________________________________ incubation mailing list [email protected] To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation
