Wayne, This is a good link, but it directly brings up the question on how this list is sorted/processed (no, I do not expect any real answer here).
E.g. looking at the first from the top with OS=new, I find https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9015 <https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9015>, which is idle since 9 months. On the P3, one of the top most is https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8443 <https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8443> from July 2014… This seems to suggest that the sorting does not have any meaning, because obviously many other CQs from lower on the list have been processed. So I do not see how this link answers Werner’s question (and I am personally interested because it was me who created the CQ). But back to the original topic, Christopher’s question points at a real problem that projects with many external dependencies clearly suffer - I haven’t done any release for 1.5 years now, since there are long running CQs without an indication by when they might become approved. Regards, Kai > On 22 Mar 2016, at 19:35, Wayne Beaton <[email protected]> wrote: > > The IP Team's work queue is accessible by clicking "IP Team Work Queue" at > the bottom of any IPZilla page. > > https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/ <https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/> > > Note to lurkers: IPZilla is only accessible by committers. > > > > On 22/03/16 09:34 AM, Werner Keil wrote: >> Hi Ben, >> >> Thanks for the input. Any idea, when the IP team might get to those CQs. We >> were at the forefront of JSRs (see >> https://github.com/jsr107/jsr107spec/issues/333 >> <https://github.com/jsr107/jsr107spec/issues/333> where JSR 107 discusses a >> possible change of the same Spec License in its public API already being >> Final there;-) but addressed all concerns by Eclipse, Apache or similar Open >> Source ecosystems where either JSR 363 or implementations (GeoAPI) are used >> or will be in the near future. >> >> Although a Java SE implementation of JSR 363 exists >> https://github.com/unitsofmeasurement/uom-se >> <https://github.com/unitsofmeasurement/uom-se> Eclipse not only the Science >> projects would benefit from using it, too, either directly or via >> implementations by UOMo. >> >> Thanks, >> Werner >> >> Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. März 2016 um 14:09 Uhr >> Von: "Benjamin Cabé" <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]> >> An: "Discussions for new Eclipse projects" <[email protected]> >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> Betreff: Re: [incubation] Interim Release with Open CQs >> Hi Werner, >> >> Like Wayne said, before producing a milestone release, or even checking in >> the code, the IP team need to grant checkin approval. It does not seem to be >> the case yet for the CQs you are referring to. >> >> Benjamin – >> >> >> De : < >> <x-msg://11/[email protected]>[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Werner Keil < >> <x-msg://11/[email protected]>[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> >> Répondre à : Discussions for new Eclipse projects < >> <x-msg://11/[email protected]>[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> >> Date : mardi 22 mars 2016 12:28 >> À : < <x-msg://11/[email protected]>[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> >> Cc : <[email protected] <x-msg://11/[email protected]>> >> Objet : Re: [incubation] Interim Release with Open CQs >> >> Hi Wayne, >> >> Thanks for sharing. Guess it also means, incubating UoMo can do a branch or >> even Milestone release using JSR 363 till the 2 new CQs by SmartHome >> >> <https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10855>https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10855 >> <https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10855> >> >> <https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10854>https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10854 >> <https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10854> >> are through?;-) >> >> Werner >> >> Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. März 2016 um 04:05 Uhr >> Von: "Wayne Beaton" < <x-msg://11/[email protected]>[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> >> An: [email protected] <x-msg://11/[email protected]> >> Betreff: Re: [incubation] Interim Release with Open CQs >> Hi Christopher. >> >> Projects can do releases while in incubation. >> >> All CQs for code/libraries that are included in the release bits must be >> closed/approved by the IP Team prior to the release. >> >> In the time leading up to the release, you can and should distribute >> milestone builds that includes code/libraries that the IP team has granted >> checkin approval for. These are not official releases, and should be >> annotated as such (e.g. 0.7M2). >> >> I recommend that the Science Working Group make a master list of all the >> open CQs that are required for the coordinated autumn release that we can >> present to the IP Team along with your last question. This should be a >> relatively easy query if we have a list of participating projects. Giving >> the IP Team a clear picture of what needs to be accomplished is the best way >> of getting that question answered. >> >> By way of background for those readers who are not involved in the Science >> Working Group's communications: several of the Science projects have decided >> to do a coordinated release in the fall (along the lines of what the >> Planning Council does with the Simultaneous Release) >> >> HTH, >> >> Wayne >> >> On 21/03/16 07:04 PM, Christopher Brooks wrote: >> Triquetrum is using the Parallel IP Process. >> >> We have open CQs for third party material: >> >> >> <https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10439>https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10439 >> <https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10439> - diva >> https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10440 >> <https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10440> - ptolemy.actor.gui >> https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10441 >> <https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10441> - ptolemy.actor.lib >> https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10442 >> <https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10442> - ptolemy.core >> https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10443 >> <https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10443> - ptolemy.sdf >> https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10444 >> <https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10444> - ptolemy.gui >> https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10445 >> <https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10445> - ptolemy.moml >> https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10446 >> <https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10446> - org.ptolemy.commons >> https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10856 >> <https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10856> - >> ptolemy.domains.process >> >> We would like to participate in the Science/Industry Working Group Autumn >> 2016 release, which is scheduled for October 21, 2016. >> >> Can do an interim release with open CQs while remaining in incubation? >> >> https://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/HOWTO/Incubation_Phase >> <https://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/HOWTO/Incubation_Phase> says: >> >> Interim Releases. Incubation Phase projects may make releases. All major and >> minor releases must go through a Release Review >> <http://www.eclipse.org/projects/dev_process/release-review.php>. >> >> <https://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/HOWTO/Release_Reviews>https://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/HOWTO/Release_Reviews >> <https://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/HOWTO/Release_Reviews> says: >> >> Intellectual Property >> >> Before you can consider a Release Review, all of the relevant CQs must be >> approved by the Eclipse Legal team. We cannot schedule a Review before the >> Legal team has completed their work. If you are waiting for CQs, please >> review where your CQs are, and when they are scheduled to be reviewed, in >> the IP team work queue >> <https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem&remaction=run&namedcmd=IP%20Team%20Work%20Queue&sharer_id=854>. >> >> >> The above indicates to me that we need to have the CQs approved before >> release review. Does approved mean closed? >> >> If we need to have these CQs closed, is it feasible to have them closed by >> the end of September so that we can schedule a release review? >> >> Thanks, >> >> _Christopher >> >> -- >> Christopher Brooks, PMP University of California >> Academic Program Manager & Software Engineer US Mail: 337 Cory Hall >> CHESS/iCyPhy/Ptolemy/TerraSwarm Berkeley, CA 94720-1774 >> [email protected] <>, 707.332.0670 (Office: 545Q Cory) >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> incubation mailing list >> [email protected] <> >> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from >> this list, visit >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation >> <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation> >> -- >> Wayne Beaton >> @waynebeaton >> The Eclipse Foundation >> <Mail Attachment.jpeg> >> <http://www.eclipsecon.org/france2016>_______________________________________________ >> incubation mailing list >> <x-msg://11/[email protected]>[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> To change your delivery options, retrieve >> your password, or unsubscribe from this list, >> visithttps://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation >> <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation>_______________________________________________ >> incubation mailing list [email protected] >> <x-msg://11/[email protected]> To change your delivery options, >> retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit >> <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation>https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation >> >> <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation>_______________________________________________ >> incubation mailing list [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> To change your delivery options, retrieve >> your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit >> <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation>https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation >> <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> incubation mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from >> this list, visit >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation >> <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation> > > -- > Wayne Beaton > @waynebeaton > The Eclipse Foundation > <eclipsecon-130x100.jpg> > <http://www.eclipsecon.org/france2016>_______________________________________________ > incubation mailing list > [email protected] > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from > this list, visit > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation
_______________________________________________ incubation mailing list [email protected] To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation
