That's interesting. I'm not sure why that is. I thought that it was
accessible to everybody. Can somebody from the IP Team comment?
Wayne
On 22/03/16 02:48 PM, Werner Keil wrote:
Thanks, but somehow this does not seem visible for every
committer/project lead.
This is the bottom of IPZilla after i logged in:
*
Actions:
o Home <https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/>
o |New <https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/enter_bug.cgi>
o |Search <https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/query.cgi>
o |Jump to CQ #:
o |Reports <https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/report.cgi>
o |My Requests
<https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/request.cgi?requester=werner.keil%40gmx.net&requestee=werner.keil%40gmx.net&do_union=1&group=type>
o |Preferences <https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/userprefs.cgi>
o |Log out
<https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/relogin.cgi>[email protected]
o |Terms of Use <http://www.eclipse.org/legal/termsofuse.php>
*
Saved Searches:
o My CQs
<https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&long_desc_type=substring&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailassigned_to2=1&emailreporter2=1&emailcc2=1&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=cf_submitterdisplay&type0-0-0=substring&value0-0-0=werner.keil%40gmx.net&field0-0-1=reporter&type0-0-1=equals&value0-0-1=werner.keil%40gmx.net>
o Approved Orbit Bundles
<https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem&remaction=run&namedcmd=Approved%20Orbit%20Bundles&sharer_id=854>
o |Indigo
<https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem&remaction=run&namedcmd=Indigo&sharer_id=854>
o |Needed for Juno
<https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem&remaction=run&namedcmd=Needed%20for%20Juno&sharer_id=854>
*From:* Wayne Beaton <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 22, 2016 7:35 PM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [incubation] Interim Release with Open CQs
The IP Team's work queue is accessible by clicking "IP Team Work
Queue" at the bottom of any IPZilla page.
https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/ Note to lurkers: IPZilla is only
accessible by committers.
On 22/03/16 09:34 AM, Werner Keil wrote:
Hi Ben,
Thanks for the input. Any idea, when the IP team might get to those
CQs. We were at the forefront of JSRs (see
https://github.com/jsr107/jsr107spec/issues/333 where JSR 107
discusses a possible change of the same Spec License in its public
API already being Final there;-) but addressed all concerns by
Eclipse, Apache or similar Open Source ecosystems where either JSR
363 or implementations (GeoAPI) are used or will be in the near future.
Although a Java SE implementation of JSR 363 exists
https://github.com/unitsofmeasurement/uom-se Eclipse not only the
Science projects would benefit from using it, too, either directly or
via implementations by UOMo.
Thanks,
Werner
*Gesendet:* Dienstag, 22. März 2016 um 14:09 Uhr *Von:* "Benjamin
Cabé" mailto:[email protected] *An:* "Discussions for new Eclipse
projects" mailto:[email protected] *Betreff:* Re: [incubation]
Interim Release with Open CQs
Hi Werner,
Like Wayne said, before producing a milestone release, or even
checking in the code, the IP team need to grant checkin approval. It
does not seem to be the case yet for the CQs you are referring to.
Benjamin –
De : <[email protected]> on behalf of Werner Keil
<[email protected]> Répondre à : Discussions for new Eclipse
projects <[email protected]> Date : mardi 22 mars 2016 12:28 À :
<[email protected]> Cc : <wlmailhtml:[email protected]> Objet :
Re: [incubation] Interim Release with Open CQs
Hi Wayne,
Thanks for sharing. Guess it also means, incubating UoMo can do a
branch or even Milestone release using JSR 363 till the 2 new CQs
by SmartHome
https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10855
https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10854
are through?;-)
Werner
*Gesendet:* Dienstag, 22. März 2016 um 04:05 Uhr *Von:* "Wayne
Beaton" <[email protected]> *An:*
wlmailhtml:[email protected] *Betreff:* Re: [incubation]
Interim Release with Open CQs
Hi Christopher. Projects can do releases while in incubation. All
CQs for code/libraries that are included in the release bits must
be closed/approved by the IP Team prior to the release. In the
time leading up to the release, you can and should distribute
milestone builds that includes code/libraries that the IP team
has granted checkin approval for. These are not official
releases, and should be annotated as such (e.g. 0.7M2). I
recommend that the Science Working Group make a master list of
all the open CQs that are required for the coordinated autumn
release that we can present to the IP Team along with your last
question. This should be a relatively easy query if we have a
list of participating projects. Giving the IP Team a clear
picture of what needs to be accomplished is the best way of
getting that question answered. By way of background for those
readers who are not involved in the Science Working Group's
communications: several of the Science projects have decided to
do a coordinated release in the fall (along the lines of what the
Planning Council does with the Simultaneous Release) HTH, Wayne
On 21/03/16 07:04 PM, Christopher Brooks wrote:
Triquetrum is using the Parallel IP Process. We have open CQs
for third party material:
https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10439 -
diva
https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10440 -
ptolemy.actor.gui
https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10441 -
ptolemy.actor.lib
https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10442 -
ptolemy.core
https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10443 -
ptolemy.sdf
https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10444 -
ptolemy.gui
https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10445 -
ptolemy.moml
https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10446 -
org.ptolemy.commons
https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10856 -
ptolemy.domains.process
We would like to participate in the Science/Industry Working
Group Autumn 2016 release, which is scheduled for October 21,
2016. Can do an interim release with open CQs while remaining
in incubation?
https://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/HOWTO/Incubation_Phase
says:
* *Interim Releases.* Incubation Phase projects may
make releases. All major and minor releases must go
through a Release Review
<http://www.eclipse.org/projects/dev_process/release-review.php>.
https://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/HOWTO/Release_Reviews
says:
Intellectual Property
Before you can consider a Release Review, all of the
relevant CQs must be approved by the Eclipse Legal team.
We cannot schedule a Review before the Legal team has
completed their work. If you are waiting for CQs, please
review where your CQs are, and when they are scheduled to
be reviewed, in the IP team work queue
<https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem&remaction=run&namedcmd=IP%20Team%20Work%20Queue&sharer_id=854>.
The above indicates to me that we need to have the CQs
approved before release review. Does approved mean closed?
If we need to have these CQs closed, is it feasible to have
them closed by the end of September so that we can schedule a
release review? Thanks, _Christopher
-- Christopher Brooks, PMP University of California Academic
Program Manager & Software Engineer US Mail: 337 Cory Hall
CHESS/iCyPhy/Ptolemy/TerraSwarm Berkeley, CA 94720-1774
[email protected], 707.332.0670 (Office: 545Q Cory)
_______________________________________________ incubation
mailing list [email protected] To change your delivery
options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this
list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation
-- Wayne Beaton @waynebeaton The Eclipse Foundation EclipseCon
France 2016 <http://www.eclipsecon.org/france2016>
_______________________________________________ incubation
mailing list [email protected] To change your delivery
options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list,
visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation
_______________________________________________ incubation
mailing list wlmailhtml:[email protected] To change your
delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation
_______________________________________________ incubation mailing
list [email protected] To change your delivery options, retrieve
your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation
_______________________________________________
incubation mailing list
[email protected]
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation
-- Wayne Beaton @waynebeaton The Eclipse Foundation EclipseCon France
2016 <http://www.eclipsecon.org/france2016>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ incubation mailing
list [email protected] To change your delivery options, retrieve
your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation
_______________________________________________
incubation mailing list
[email protected]
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation
-- Wayne Beaton @waynebeaton The Eclipse Foundation EclipseCon France
2016 <http://www.eclipsecon.org/france2016>
_______________________________________________
incubation mailing list
[email protected]
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation
