Shawn Walker wrote:
> Those are all great reasons for shipping top.
>
> So, then the question becomes, should we fix prstat's shortcomings or
> ship top and accept defeat? (only half joking)
>
> This is a case where I would rather fix all the problems or
> shortcomings that prstat has then ship top simply because its easier.
>
> I would be inclined to fix prstat, and then setup a symlink so that
> when prstat is invoked as top, it shows output like top would...
>
> Do you foresee a problem with that?
>   

Okay, I'll bite. Yes I do. Why would somebody want to spend man weeks/months
re-engineering prstat to look like something that already exists and works?
I'd like to think that Sun could just gracefully admit that top (mostly)
does a better job and gracefully go with it.

I'd also like to think that we could all focus on the much bigger picture
that trying to nut out whether we should be shipping prstat and/or top on
the core CD.


_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss

Reply via email to