On 6/21/07, Ian Murdock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm not at all opposed to multiple distributions as long as > they're compatible with each other. And even if they're not, that's fine > too, as long as they're not called OpenSolaris (which implies > compatibility--to earlier points, lineage from a common source > base doesn't mean much).
So if it's compatibility you're after, why not just call Solaris Express: (Community|Developer) Edition "OpenSolaris", after all, it's the one which most closely resembles Solaris, and call Indiana something else? Because OpenSolaris is a pile of code, and SX is an opensolaris based distribution.... that's why. -- PGP Public Key 0x437AF1A1 Availiable on hkp://pgp.mit.edu _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
