> > Keep in mind that the IPS package of OOo 2.4 was > the first time such a > > complicate application portfolio was packaged under > the new process. > > We had several others problems, which prompted us > to do the change. > > Could you outline the problems you ran into, > please? We'd like to > correct them, if possible. (If there are existing > bug reports for > these problems, just let me know--sorry if I missed > them.) > Thanks > Stephen > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
Hi Steven, Thanks for paying attention to a casual comment that I inadvertently made. We don't have any machine that's running OOo 2.4 at the present time. However, if and when it is upgraded to 2.4.1, I will be more than happy to go through our routines. I don't remember the problems being substantive. The problems were primarily (or solely) related to localization issues. They may not be IPS-related problems, and I apologize for using such a broad brush in such a casual manner. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
