Hi, > > [...] > > > > I'm very carefully staying out of the /opt debate as I know I don't > > understand enough of the consequences of. That said, the first step in > > being able to get this fix in is to fix the existing packages in our > > distro, something we could definitely use some help with since the > > problems, I believe, may be relevant for the nevada and S10 distros as well. > > The first thing to settle in the /opt debate is: what are the rules for > OpenSolaris? So far we have Shawn's opinion, but we don't know that > it's authoritative. Third parties can reasonably think that they have a > pressing need to resolve that issue. Then we can leisurely debate what > the answer should be (as opposed to what it is).
man filesystem on Indiana is speaking clearly. Even Sun IPS repositories are delivering "non-bundled" SW to /opt No 3rd party SW should go to /usr (non-compliant SW could reuse /usr/local). At least Indiana documentation is written in such way. Best regards, Milan _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
