In addition, the plant was glabrous. SM
On Wednesday, August 13, 2014 7:22:04 PM UTC+5:30, Samir Mehta wrote: > > > @ Koraigad, 09-08-2014 with Dinesh ji. > > The 5 foliate leaves (-39), the short, conical stigma (-44), the 4 lobed > disc and 4 merous flowers are clearly seen. The longer petiolule of the > terminal leaflet (-39) is also appreciated. The leaf opposed tendril is > also seen. > However, in my specimen the leaves are a bit broader (they are classically > described as 'lanceolate'). Plant was not fruiting. > > This species, I believe, has not been positively identified earlier and is > not there in the eFI database (do not see it on FOI either). > > Regards, > > Samir Mehta > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
