Good find. Dr Satish Phadke
On 13 August 2014 19:37, Samir Mehta <[email protected]> wrote: > In addition, the plant was glabrous. > > SM > > > On Wednesday, August 13, 2014 7:22:04 PM UTC+5:30, Samir Mehta wrote: >> >> >> @ Koraigad, 09-08-2014 with Dinesh ji. >> >> The 5 foliate leaves (-39), the short, conical stigma (-44), the 4 lobed >> disc and 4 merous flowers are clearly seen. The longer petiolule of the >> terminal leaflet (-39) is also appreciated. The leaf opposed tendril is >> also seen. >> However, in my specimen the leaves are a bit broader (they are >> classically described as 'lanceolate'). Plant was not fruiting. >> >> This species, I believe, has not been positively identified earlier and >> is not there in the eFI database (do not see it on FOI either). >> >> Regards, >> >> Samir Mehta >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "efloraofindia" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
