Thank Dinesh ji, Dr. Mehta.
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Satish Phadke <[email protected]> wrote: > Good find. > > Dr Satish Phadke > > > On 13 August 2014 19:37, Samir Mehta <[email protected]> wrote: > >> In addition, the plant was glabrous. >> >> SM >> >> >> On Wednesday, August 13, 2014 7:22:04 PM UTC+5:30, Samir Mehta wrote: >>> >>> >>> @ Koraigad, 09-08-2014 with Dinesh ji. >>> >>> The 5 foliate leaves (-39), the short, conical stigma (-44), the 4 lobed >>> disc and 4 merous flowers are clearly seen. The longer petiolule of the >>> terminal leaflet (-39) is also appreciated. The leaf opposed tendril is >>> also seen. >>> However, in my specimen the leaves are a bit broader (they are >>> classically described as 'lanceolate'). Plant was not fruiting. >>> >>> This species, I believe, has not been positively identified earlier and >>> is not there in the eFI database (do not see it on FOI either). >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Samir Mehta >>> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "efloraofindia" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
