Very nice photograph.CONGRATS.
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 10:50 PM, surajit koley < [email protected]> wrote: > Thank you very much Sir. But, besides the colours of sepal and petal there > are differences in lamina and anther (not seen in my pictures) colour > too. If we follow FoC why don't we use *Nymphaea lotus* var. *pubescens* > (Willd.) Hook. f.. & Thomson? There is also an end note in FoC - > http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=200007088 > > Regards > > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Agreed both The Plant List and GRIN consider N. rubra as distinct >> species, but having seen and reported huge number of errors in The Plant >> List and Limited coverage by GRIN, I prefer to follow eFl of China being >> latest of all Floras, and MULTILINGUAL MULTISCRIPT PLANT NAME DATABASE >> Sorting Plant Names, both of which treat N. rubra as synonym of N. >> pubescens. I have seen plants with both red and white flowers growing in >> the same pond in Delhi and I could not detect any differences other than >> flower colour. Besides my observation were very similar to eFl of China >> "*Nvmphaea >> rubra* Roth. is sometimes treated as an independent species. Canard, The >> Water Lilies: Monog. Genus Nymphaea 199.1905 distinguished *Nymphaea >> rubra* Roxb. from *Nymphaea pubescens* Willd. on the basis of colour of >> flowers and size of the leaves. In the former species, the flowers are pink >> with larger leaves and in the later species the flowers are white with >> smaller leaves. However, we have seen the plants with white flowers and >> larger leaves or vice versa. Therefore, *Nymphaea rubra* Roxb. is >> treated here as a synonym of *Nymphaea pubescens* Willd." >> >> >> Dr. Gurcharan Singh >> Retired Associate Professor >> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 >> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. >> Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 >> http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/ >> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ >> >> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 9:12 PM, surajit koley < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Some related literatures - >>> >>> - http://archive.lib.cmu.ac.th/full/T/2008/biol0708wl_ch3.pdf >>> - http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10722-014-0177-3 >>> - a blog by Lalithamba Madam - >>> http://floraandhrika.blogspot.in/2012_11_01_archive.html >>> >>> As per the document in the first link above this should be *N. rubra* Roxb, >>> ex Salisb., the accepted name of which might be *N. rubra* Roxb. ex >>> Andrews <http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/taxon.pl?415655#syn> >>> >>> Thank you very much Didi for your support >>> Regards >>> >>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 4:54 PM, surajit koley < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Thank you Didi for raising my concern. >>>> Regards >>>> >>>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Ushadi Micromini < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Gurcharanji, Yes, i add my voice to Surajit's >>>>> We definitely need a well thought out disscussion and may be a key >>>>> >>>>> I somehow think Gurcharanji had made a key a few years ago... >>>>> >>>>> but cant be sure >>>>> >>>>> so a discussion now would be appropriate... tonnes of hybrids in >>>>> france, england and usa for the last 100+ years and privacy/secrecy by the >>>>> authors of such hybridization does not help in simplification.. >>>>> >>>>> still.... >>>>> this request >>>>> >>>>> Usha di >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 1:30 PM, surajit koley < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I attach more photographs, KEY in BP & BoBO and entry of *N. lotus* in >>>>>> FI, because, though I titled the thread as I found post of same >>>>>> species >>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/kQHDnBzDHkQ/CJXUCTj5ZyMJ> >>>>>> (?) >>>>>> in efi >>>>>> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/m---z/n/nymphaeaceae/nymphaea/nymphaea-rubra>, >>>>>> I think the accepted name of *N. rubra* should be sorted out to help >>>>>> identify other red coloured ones. More so because Gurcharan Sir has >>>>>> identified a red coloured in the thread >>>>>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/indiantreepix/9VO0GQhq1VE as *N. >>>>>> pubescence*. More similar looking species ids pending. >>>>>> >>>>>> With limited knowledge, experience, resources I am confused with what >>>>>> I found in FoC FoP FoNA GRIN TPL. >>>>>> >>>>>> Combining all the above efloras with Prain and Haines I think we >>>>>> should follow FoC - >>>>>> http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=200007088 >>>>>> >>>>>> I request Gurcharan Sir and others in the rank......... to take care >>>>>> and inform us what should we follow. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 11:06 PM, surajit koley < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> These pictures are from IBG >>>>>>> Thank you >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "efloraofindia" group. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. >>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Usha di >>>>> =========== >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "efloraofindia" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "efloraofindia" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
