Thank you very much Sir. Regards surajit On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Narain Singh Chauhan < [email protected]> wrote:
> Very nice photograph.CONGRATS. > > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 10:50 PM, surajit koley < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Thank you very much Sir. But, besides the colours of sepal and petal >> there are differences in lamina and anther (not seen in my pictures) colour >> too. If we follow FoC why don't we use *Nymphaea lotus* var. *pubescens* >> (Willd.) Hook. f.. & Thomson? There is also an end note in FoC - >> http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=200007088 >> >> Regards >> >> >> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Agreed both The Plant List and GRIN consider N. rubra as distinct >>> species, but having seen and reported huge number of errors in The Plant >>> List and Limited coverage by GRIN, I prefer to follow eFl of China being >>> latest of all Floras, and MULTILINGUAL MULTISCRIPT PLANT NAME DATABASE >>> Sorting Plant Names, both of which treat N. rubra as synonym of N. >>> pubescens. I have seen plants with both red and white flowers growing in >>> the same pond in Delhi and I could not detect any differences other than >>> flower colour. Besides my observation were very similar to eFl of China >>> "*Nvmphaea >>> rubra* Roth. is sometimes treated as an independent species. Canard, >>> The Water Lilies: Monog. Genus Nymphaea 199.1905 distinguished *Nymphaea >>> rubra* Roxb. from *Nymphaea pubescens* Willd. on the basis of colour of >>> flowers and size of the leaves. In the former species, the flowers are pink >>> with larger leaves and in the later species the flowers are white with >>> smaller leaves. However, we have seen the plants with white flowers and >>> larger leaves or vice versa. Therefore, *Nymphaea rubra* Roxb. is >>> treated here as a synonym of *Nymphaea pubescens* Willd." >>> >>> >>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh >>> Retired Associate Professor >>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 >>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. >>> Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 >>> http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/ >>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ >>> >>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 9:12 PM, surajit koley < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Some related literatures - >>>> >>>> - http://archive.lib.cmu.ac.th/full/T/2008/biol0708wl_ch3.pdf >>>> - http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10722-014-0177-3 >>>> - a blog by Lalithamba Madam - >>>> http://floraandhrika.blogspot.in/2012_11_01_archive.html >>>> >>>> As per the document in the first link above this should be *N. rubra* Roxb, >>>> ex Salisb., the accepted name of which might be *N. rubra* Roxb. ex >>>> Andrews <http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/taxon.pl?415655#syn> >>>> >>>> Thank you very much Didi for your support >>>> Regards >>>> >>>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 4:54 PM, surajit koley < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thank you Didi for raising my concern. >>>>> Regards >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Ushadi Micromini < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Gurcharanji, Yes, i add my voice to Surajit's >>>>>> We definitely need a well thought out disscussion and may be a key >>>>>> >>>>>> I somehow think Gurcharanji had made a key a few years ago... >>>>>> >>>>>> but cant be sure >>>>>> >>>>>> so a discussion now would be appropriate... tonnes of hybrids in >>>>>> france, england and usa for the last 100+ years and privacy/secrecy by >>>>>> the >>>>>> authors of such hybridization does not help in simplification.. >>>>>> >>>>>> still.... >>>>>> this request >>>>>> >>>>>> Usha di >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 1:30 PM, surajit koley < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I attach more photographs, KEY in BP & BoBO and entry of *N. lotus* in >>>>>>> FI, because, though I titled the thread as I found post of same >>>>>>> species >>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/kQHDnBzDHkQ/CJXUCTj5ZyMJ> >>>>>>> (?) >>>>>>> in efi >>>>>>> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/m---z/n/nymphaeaceae/nymphaea/nymphaea-rubra>, >>>>>>> I think the accepted name of *N. rubra* should be sorted out to >>>>>>> help identify other red coloured ones. More so because Gurcharan Sir has >>>>>>> identified a red coloured in the thread >>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/indiantreepix/9VO0GQhq1VE as >>>>>>> *N. pubescence*. More similar looking species ids pending. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> With limited knowledge, experience, resources I am confused with >>>>>>> what I found in FoC FoP FoNA GRIN TPL. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Combining all the above efloras with Prain and Haines I think we >>>>>>> should follow FoC - >>>>>>> http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=200007088 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I request Gurcharan Sir and others in the rank......... to take care >>>>>>> and inform us what should we follow. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 11:06 PM, surajit koley < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> These pictures are from IBG >>>>>>>> Thank you >>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "efloraofindia" group. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. >>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Usha di >>>>>> =========== >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "efloraofindia" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>> >>> >>> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "efloraofindia" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
