Thanks Surajit ji for dissection of the various descriptions ! Just for information, a descriptive name given in Tamil lexicon <http://dsalsrv02.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/philologic/getobject.pl?c.1:1:6189.tamillex> [Madras], University of Madras for *J. rottlerianum* ... synonym of *J. coarctatum* var *coarctatum*. is *white-bracted jasmine* ! Not sure whether the bracts of *J. coarctatum *are indeed white-coloured; it could also imply the bracts are brighter OR lighter tone than that of other *Jasminum* species.
Regards. Dinesh On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 8:56 PM, surajit koley <[email protected] > wrote: > Dinesh Ji, > > I think the confusion lies in the description of bracts. Even Flora Indica > recorded bracts are few, lanceolate in *J. pubescens*. Surprisingly FI > doesn't give description of bracts of *J. coarctatum*, only informs. > "amply bracted." > > Sir Prain also recorded that bracts, in *J. pubescens*, often absent, if > present ovate-lanceolate. > > Only Haines, in his BoBO, described "bracts same shape as leaves". > > Perhaps Rheede's illustration may also created confusion which was > addressed in FBI. You might have already read the FBI and other literature. > Yet I attach here the FBI and BoBO entry, for further examination. > > Thank you very much. > > Regards > > surajit > > > > On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Dinesh Valke <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I went through all the posts in the group's database. Those posted from >> the north India as *J. multiflorum* are definitely different from what I >> have posted. The posted plant agrees very well with *J. coarctatum. * >> >> I also found another post from south (Anurag's ANFEB29 >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/E2v-vQtyIIQ/q1IjXKwogUQJ>) >> which was thought to be *J. multiflorum* - but you have commented as *J. >> coarctatum.* >> >> Many many thanks Surajit ji for validating this ID. Will correct my notes >> at flickr soon. >> >> Regards, >> Dinesh >> >> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 8:41 AM, surajitkoley < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Dinesh Ji, >>> >>> It looks different to what I have, identified by Santhosh Sir, twice. >>> I think your flickr uploads of *J. multiflorum* and *J. coarctatum* got >>> mixed up. >>> Please correct me if I am wrong. >>> >>> Thank you >>> Regards >>> surajit >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Monday, 2 March 2015 19:44:28 UTC+5:30, Dinesh Valke wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> [image: Mollem National Park] >>>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.flickr.com%2Fphotos%2Fdinesh_valke%2F16693248625&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFrqEzdU1yr-dhDNWNlrHzVrIWzDkG3nBQ>Mollem >>>> National Park ... Goa >>>> *Date*: 23 APR 2011 ... *Altitude*: about 200 m asl >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> *Jasminum multiflorum* (Burm.f.) Andrews ... (family: Oleaceae)[image: >>>> Jasminum multiflorum (Burm.f.) Andrews] >>>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.flickr.com%2Fphotos%2Fdinesh_valke%2F5661090073&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFrqEzeaWMkeNYntYTRPsYw8KmxxrPGyww> >>>> >>>> >>>> [image: Kunda (Sanskrit: कुन्द)] >>>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.flickr.com%2Fphotos%2Fdinesh_valke%2F5661092479&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFrqEzfhmc0KlqYQ4SQE2OoH2HCBWdJupQ> >>>> >>>> >>>> [image: Kunda (Hindi: कुंद)] >>>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.flickr.com%2Fphotos%2Fdinesh_valke%2F5661095327&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFrqEzebVeQvFjlQPxNRH8Lu8SDawIIO-A> >>>> Regards. >>>> Dinesh >>>> >>> >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
