Perhaps this should help in reaching conclusion keeping in mind conclusions
by me and Garg ji.

http://plants.jstor.org/stable/10.5555/al.ap.specimen.k000950197.




Dr. Gurcharan Singh
Retired  Associate Professor
SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/
http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 8:07 PM, surajit koley <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Dear Anurag Ji,
>
> I can clearly see the fruits of this species, those fruits can't be called
> smooth and Roxburgh was correct. I said Roxburgh would know his species
> better than any other source.
>
> I copy here a few words from "Revision of the Genus *Aponogeton* / H. W.
> E. VAN BRUGGEN" :-
>
>    - ovules 4-8; tepals white, pink, or violet ... fruit with very long
>    (1mm) terminal beak = *natans*
>    - ovules 2 (seldom1); ................... fruit smooth = *crispus*
>    - do ...............................     fruit mostly with irregular
>    excrescences, seldom smooth.... = *echinatus*
>
> The differences between the 2nd and 3rd above lie in tuber, leaf,
> inflorescence, tepal, filament, fruit and plumule.
>
> So, you can boldly go ahead with the ID *A. echinatus* Roxb. with your
> species, no matter eFI admit or not.
>
> Thank you
> Regards
>
> surajit koley
>
> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 7:45 PM, surajit koley <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> So where do we stand Sir?
>>
>> Roxburgh's *A. echinatus*(*m*) is dubius/uncofirmed, meaning Roxburgh
>> may not be correct at all! Thereby Wight and Prain are also wrong!
>>
>> TPL thinks *A. echinatus* Roxb. is synonymous with, that too with three
>> stars, with *A. crispus* Thunb.
>>
>> You, based on inflorescence colour and Garg Sir, based on leaf, think the
>> species submitted by Anurag Ji is *A. natans* (L.) Engl. & K. Krause.
>>
>> So be it..... thank you very much.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> surajit
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Surajit ji
>>> Current accpted name of A. echinatum Roxb. is A. crispus and not A.
>>> natans. Please note that Engler's revision puts it under unconfirmed/dubius
>>> species. Even FBI mentions mix up in Roxburgh's plates.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
>>> Retired  Associate Professor
>>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
>>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
>>> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
>>> http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/
>>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 6:54 PM, surajit koley <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks Sir for taking care. Anurag Ji's point is that fruits here are
>>>> echinate, so it should be *A. echinatum* Roxb. Now, if the current
>>>> accepted name of *A. echinatum* Roxb. is *A. natans* then it is the
>>>> same.
>>>>
>>>> The problem is old lit consider all three different taxa.
>>>>
>>>> Another problem is nowhere I could find that *A. natans* can have
>>>> echinate fruit/capsule.
>>>>
>>>> Here is a paper from Pakistan
>>>> http://www.pakbs.org/pjbot/PDFs/40(1)/PJB40(1)001.pdf
>>>>
>>>> And here is the protologue -
>>>> http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/16802027#page/16/mode/1up
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> While doing ecology practicals nearly 48 years back in Kashmir, and
>>>>> luckily I still remember, we had a few clear cut species of Potamogeton: 
>>>>> P.
>>>>> pectinatus with finely dissected leaves, P. lucens with semitransparent
>>>>> leaves, P. natans with thick flat shining floating leaves and P. crispus
>>>>> with wavy (crisped) leaves. We did not know about Aponogeton as it is a
>>>>> basically an ornamental plant of warmer climates, mostly used in aquarium.
>>>>> Yet it has two similar species (which differ besides technical characters,
>>>>> by the absence of above mud stems clearly seen in Potamogeton). with
>>>>> similar names Aponogeton natans (with broad flat leaves) and A. crispus
>>>>> Thunb (syn: A. echinatus Roxb.). To me both Potamogeton crispus and
>>>>> Aponogeton crispus are out of contension. Whereas presence or absence of
>>>>> above mud stems is important for diagnosis, but the colour of 
>>>>> inflorescence
>>>>> easily places it as Aponogeton natans. I hope I am not wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
>>>>> Retired  Associate Professor
>>>>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
>>>>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
>>>>> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
>>>>> http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/
>>>>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 1:21 PM, surajitkoley <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Perhaps Roxburgh would know (his) species better than any other
>>>>>> sources. Attached here entries from FBI, FI, BP, BoBO.
>>>>>> Two kew heb -
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    1. http://apps.kew.org/herbcat/getImage.do?imageBarcode=K000950197
>>>>>>    2. http://apps.kew.org/herbcat/getImage.do?imageBarcode=K000950202
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Saturday, 2 May 2015 16:21:52 UTC+5:30, Anurag Sharma wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Family: Aponogetonaceae
>>>>>>> Date: 29th April 2015
>>>>>>> Place: Tumkur-Hassan district, Karnataka
>>>>>>> Habit: Herb
>>>>>>> Habitat: Aquatic/Pond
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>  --
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "efloraofindia" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to