Dear Dr Rawat
Thanks for your comments and observations.  It is such an asset to this group 
to have a keen and knowledgeable observeractive in Uttarakhund - which I have 
only visited briefly, on one occasion and have few references about.  Sorry, I 
am more familiar with Uttaranachal and Uttar Pradesh plus Kumaon (and Garwhal 
from the British days).   There are many species found in Nepal also in this 
region indeed this is the NW limit of the distribution of more typically 
'Eastern Himalayan' species and Dr Rawat has been able to located specimensnot 
recorded from the region previously.  The only way our knowledge of the region 
will increase is with observant, active field-botanistsundertaking extensive 
surveys.  You are setting an example for others to follow.
I personally consider a vegetational division into 'Western' and 'Eastern' 
Himalaya as too simplistic (though there will never be perfectseparations and 
always some overlap).  But I feel plant distribution-wise, better to have 
'Western' (more accurately North-Western Himalaya) covering 'Kashmir' sensu 
lato and Himchal Pradesh then 'Central Himalaya' covering Uttarakhund plus West 
& CentralNepal, then 'Eastern Himalaya' covering Eastern Nepal, Sikkim & 
Bhutan.   I do not consider the mountains of SW China to form partof the 
Himalaya proper. Polunin & Stainton within 'Flowers of the Himalaya' considered 
that the Himalaya stretched from Nanga Parbat on the Indus eastwards to Namcha 
Barwa on the bend of the Tsangpo in S-E Tibet for 2250km. Whereas their book 
covered only the part of therange which lies within Nepal and the Indian 
Western Himalaya, a distance of 1450km.  The Nepal-Sikkim border was chosen as 
the eastern boundary of their area with the India-Pakistan border as the 
western boundary. 
Do not know the flora of Arunachal sufficiently well to comment where this 
should be placed.
I do not agree in the 'Sino-Japanese' Phytogeographic Region from Japan, Korea, 
south west China westward through what was upper Assam, Tiawan, Bhutan, west 
Nepa, Himachal Pradesh and Kashmir.  The suggestion that there are many 
Sino-Japanese elements found in the 'Himalayan' zone within Pakistan e.g. is 
false....
Returning to the Delphinium photographed at Gunji.   I do have some images 
(cannot locate them at present) taken in the Upper KaliGandaki which from my 
memory looked similar to these.  Will be interesting to compare them.
I have a copy of 'Flora of Mustang, Nepal' Edited by Ohba, Ioakawa & Sharma 
(2008) - which I have found far from exhaustive which gives many specimens of 
D.kamaonense (plus a few of the similar D.caeruleum) from moist grassy slopes & 
shrubberies.  D.denudatum is not recorded from this region.
Strangely, D.denudatum is not included in 'Enumeration of the Flowering Plants 
of Nepal' yet its distribution in 'Flowers of the Himalaya' is given into 
Central Nepal (from 1500-2700m, so Gunji is beyond this altitude-wise) on 
grassy banks & margins of fields.  Strange, as the Enumeration formed the main 
basis (along with the reference collections of pressed specimens in the 
herbarium of the Natural History Museum, London) of Polunin & Stainton's work.
One can find images of D.kamaonense on the internet but these were taken in 
China by Professor Boufford (of Harvard) and his colleagues.  Whilst one can 
have a high degree of confidence in the reliability of these, as accompanying 
herbarium specimens would have been taken and subsequently 'determined' by 
comparison with other reference pressed specimens (allowing examination 
close-up of floral and foliage parts which the two photos from Gunji do not), 
species which occur over a wide geographic range will inevitably vary (whether 
or not such variation is recognised at varietal or subspecies level or when a 
genus is revised sometimes as separate species) so must be examined with 
caution.

Best Wishes,

Chris Chadwell

81 Parlaunt Road 
SLOUGH
SL3 8BE
UK

www.shpa.org.uk





      From: D.S Rawat <[email protected]>
 To: C CHADWELL <[email protected]> 
Cc: J.M. Garg <[email protected]>; efloraofindia 
<[email protected]>; Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]>; Nidhan 
Singh <[email protected]>
 Sent: Friday, 4 November 2016, 5:05
 Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:254590] Kailash-Mansarovar Yatra::Delphinium Sp 
for ID NSJ-OCT 16/24
   
Both these species D. denudatum and D.kamaonense have finely dissected leaves, 
though the images lack any leaves and stem part.
The possibility suggested by Chadwell Ji may be more closer as the altitude of 
collection of this plant is mentioned around 3000m which is well within the 
altitudinal distribution of D.kamaonense (3000-4600m in Kumaon, Uttarakhand). 
Moreover, this species is reported from Pithoragarh District of Uttarakhand 
(Pangtey et al. 1988. Contribution to the flora of Pithoragarh district (Kumaun 
Himalaya) which is adjacent to Nepal.  
D.denudatum has an overlapping range of altitudinal distribution (1800-4000m in 
W.Himalaya) and known to occur in Pithoragarh district (Pangtey et al. 1988).
I have seen only D. denudatum in nature and it often occur at around 1000-2200m 
throughout Uttarakhand.
The Kailash-Mansarovar track follows the Kali river valley mainly and I have 
gone only up to Malipa (2300m); Gunji is far ahead of this place.

DSRawat Pantnagar  


Dr D.S.RawatDepartment of Biological Sciences, G.B. Pant University of 
Agriculture & Technology Pantnagar-263 145 Uttarakhand, INDIAeflorapantnagar 
displaying wild flora of Pantnagar

On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 11:53 PM, C CHADWELL <[email protected]> 
wrote:

No, I do not consider the images taken near Guni camp are of D.denudatum.
We are at a considerable disadvantage not being able to properly see the stem 
or basal leavesand with Delphiniums having a side view of the flowers to show 
the spur better helps.
May I repeat a plea.  Please take many more than 1-3 images of just the flowers 
and post more.  Foliage (bothupper & basal leaves, ideally showing lower 
surface as well), habit, habitat are really important.Without such images one 
is left trying to work out the picture of a jigsaw with lots of missing pieces.
It was the standard thing to just take one or two photos focussing on the 
flowers only in the past (which is whatI did when using slides and the 
requirement of changing lenses and a tripod) but modestly-priced 
second-handcompact digital cameras are now readily available with wonderful 
lenses for good close-ups and once into aroutine it does not take long to take 
the requisite images.  Such a shame if missing images make it impossible forus 
to be sure which species a specimen belongs to or requires vastly more time and 
effort on our part.  Never easyto return to the site especially when trekking 
high in the mountains.
Nevertheless, I currently think that the best bet would be D.kamaonense - 
recorded from Kumaon to Central Nepal@ 3000-4300m.  'Flowers of the Himalaya' 
say common on open slopes in Nepal, so quite possible from this location.
Perhaps Dr Rawat has come across D.kamaonense in Uttarakhand?
Any other suggestions?

Best Wishes,

Chris Chadwell

81 Parlaunt Road 
SLOUGH
SL3 8BE
UK

www.shpa.org.uk





     

 From: J.M. Garg <[email protected]>
 To: D. S Rawat <[email protected]> 
Cc: chrischadwell261@btinternet. com; efloraofindia 
<indiantreepix@googlegroups. com>; Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]>; Nidhan 
Singh <[email protected]>
 Sent: Thursday, 3 November 2016, 13:32
 Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:254590] Kailash-Mansarovar Yatra::Delphinium Sp 
for ID NSJ-OCT 16/24
  
Thanks, Rawat ji for your keen eye.
On 3 Nov 2016 2:15 pm, "D.S Rawat" <[email protected]> wrote:

Some leaves obscurely visible in background indicate possibility of D.denudatum.
eFI page on D.denudatum.

DSRawat Pantnagar

Dr D.S.RawatDepartment of Biological Sciences, G.B. Pant University of 
Agriculture & Technology Pantnagar-263 145 Uttarakhand, INDIAeflorapantnagar 
displaying wild flora of Pantnagar

On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 11:14 AM, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote:

Forwarding again for Id assistance please.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Narendra Joshi <[email protected]>
Date: 23 October 2016 at 15:21
Subject: [efloraofindia:254590] Kailash-Mansarovar Yatra::Delphinium Sp for ID 
NSJ-OCT 16/24
To: indiantreepix <[email protected] m>


Dear Members,

Delphinium Sp for ID. Photo taken near Gunji camp (Uttarakhand) Aug 2016, 
Altitude 10500 feet.

-- 
With Regards,
Narendra Joshi-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to indiantreepix+unsubscribe@goog legroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected] .
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/grou p/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/op tout.



-- 
With regards,
J.M.Garg'Creating awareness of IndianFlora & Fauna'Winner of Wipro-NFS Sparrow 
Awards 2014 for efloraofindia. 
For identification,learning, discussion & documentation of Indian Flora, please 
visit/ joinour EfloraofindiaGoogle e-group (largestin the world- around 2700 
members & 2,40,000 messages on 31.3.16) orEfloraofindia website (with a species 
database of more than11,000 species & 2,20,000 images). The whole world uses my 
Image Resource of more than a thousand species & eight thousand images of 
Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc. (arranged alphabetically & place-wise). You can 
also use them for free as per Creative Commons license attached with each 
image.Also author of 'APhotoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common Birds of 
India'. 




   



   

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to