Thanks, Chadwell ji and Rawat ji

On 4 Nov 2016 5:29 pm, "C CHADWELL" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Dear Dr Rawat
>
> Thanks for your comments and observations.  It is such an asset to this
> group to have a keen and knowledgeable observer
> active in Uttarakhund - which I have only visited briefly, on one occasion
> and have few references about.  Sorry, I am more familiar with Uttaranachal
> and Uttar Pradesh plus Kumaon (and Garwhal from the British days).   There
> are many species found in Nepal also in this region indeed this is the NW
> limit of the distribution of more typically 'Eastern Himalayan' species and
> Dr Rawat has been able to located specimens
> not recorded from the region previously.  The only way our knowledge of
> the region will increase is with observant, active field-botanists
> undertaking extensive surveys.  You are setting an example for others to
> follow.
>
> I personally consider a vegetational division into 'Western' and 'Eastern'
> Himalaya as too simplistic (though there will never be perfect
> separations and always some overlap).  But I feel plant distribution-wise,
> better to have 'Western' (more accurately North-Western
> Himalaya) covering 'Kashmir' sensu lato and Himchal Pradesh then 'Central
> Himalaya' covering Uttarakhund plus West & Central
> Nepal, then 'Eastern Himalaya' covering Eastern Nepal, Sikkim & Bhutan.
> I do not consider the mountains of SW China to form part
> of the Himalaya proper. Polunin & Stainton within 'Flowers of the
> Himalaya' considered that the Himalaya stretched from Nanga Parbat on the
> Indus eastwards to Namcha Barwa on the bend of the Tsangpo in S-E Tibet for
> 2250km. Whereas their book covered only the part of the
> range which lies within Nepal and the Indian Western Himalaya, a distance
> of 1450km.  The Nepal-Sikkim border was chosen as the eastern boundary of
> their area with the India-Pakistan border as the western boundary.
>
> Do not know the flora of Arunachal sufficiently well to comment where this
> should be placed.
>
> I do not agree in the 'Sino-Japanese' Phytogeographic Region from Japan,
> Korea, south west China westward through what was upper Assam, Tiawan,
> Bhutan, west Nepa, Himachal Pradesh and Kashmir.  The suggestion that there
> are many Sino-Japanese elements found in the 'Himalayan' zone within
> Pakistan e.g. is false....
>
> Returning to the Delphinium photographed at Gunji.   I do have some images
> (cannot locate them at present) taken in the Upper Kali
> Gandaki which from my memory looked similar to these.  Will be interesting
> to compare them.
>
> I have a copy of 'Flora of Mustang, Nepal' Edited by Ohba, Ioakawa &
> Sharma (2008) - which I have found far from exhaustive which gives many
> specimens of *D.kamaonense* (plus a few of the similar *D.caeruleum*)
> from moist grassy slopes & shrubberies.  *D.denudatum* is not recorded
> from this region.
>
> Strangely, *D.denudatum* is not included in 'Enumeration of the Flowering
> Plants of Nepal' yet its distribution in 'Flowers of the Himalaya' is given
> into Central Nepal (from 1500-2700m, so Gunji is beyond this altitude-wise)
> on grassy banks & margins of fields.  Strange, as the Enumeration formed
> the main basis (along with the reference collections of pressed specimens
> in the herbarium of the Natural History Museum, London) of Polunin &
> Stainton's work.
>
> One can find images of *D.kamaonense* on the internet but these were
> taken in China by Professor Boufford (of Harvard) and his colleagues.
> Whilst one can have a high degree of confidence in the reliability of
> these, as accompanying herbarium specimens would have been taken
> and subsequently 'determined' by comparison with other reference pressed
> specimens (allowing examination close-up of floral and foliage parts which
> the two photos from Gunji do not), species which occur over a wide
> geographic range will inevitably vary (whether or not such variation is
> recognised at varietal or subspecies level or when a genus is revised
> sometimes as separate species) so must be examined with caution.
>
>
> Best Wishes,
>
>
> Chris Chadwell
>
>
> 81 Parlaunt Road
> SLOUGH
> SL3 8BE
> UK
>
> www.shpa.org.uk
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* D.S Rawat <[email protected]>
> *To:* C CHADWELL <[email protected]>
> *Cc:* J.M. Garg <[email protected]>; efloraofindia <
> [email protected]>; Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]>;
> Nidhan Singh <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Friday, 4 November 2016, 5:05
> *Subject:* Re: [efloraofindia:254590] Kailash-Mansarovar
> Yatra::Delphinium Sp for ID NSJ-OCT 16/24
>
> Both these species *D. denudatum* and *D.kamaonense* have finely
> dissected leaves, though the images lack any leaves and stem part.
> The possibility suggested by Chadwell Ji may be more closer as the
> altitude of collection of this plant is mentioned around 3000m which is
> well within the altitudinal distribution of *D.kamaonense* (3000-4600m in
> Kumaon, Uttarakhand). Moreover, this species is reported from Pithoragarh
> District of Uttarakhand (Pangtey et al. 1988. Contribution to the flora of
> Pithoragarh district (Kumaun Himalaya) which is adjacent to Nepal.
> *D.denudatum* has an overlapping range of altitudinal distribution
> (1800-4000m in W.Himalaya) and known to occur in Pithoragarh district
> (Pangtey et al. 1988).
> I have seen only *D. denudatum* in nature and it often occur at around
> 1000-2200m throughout Uttarakhand.
> The Kailash-Mansarovar track follows the Kali river valley mainly and I
> have gone only up to Malipa (2300m); Gunji is far ahead of this place.
>
> DSRawat Pantnagar
>
>
> Dr D.S.Rawat
> Department of Biological Sciences, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture &
> Technology Pantnagar-263 145 Uttarakhand, INDIA
> *eflorapantnagar* <https://sites.google.com/site/eflorapantnagar/home>
> displaying wild flora of Pantnagar
>
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 11:53 PM, C CHADWELL <chrischadwell261@btinternet.
> com> wrote:
>
> No, I do not consider the images taken near Guni camp are of *D.denudatum*
> .
>
> We are at a considerable disadvantage not being able to properly see the
> stem or basal leaves
> and with Delphiniums having a side view of the flowers to show the spur
> better helps.
>
> *May I repeat a plea.  Please take many more than 1-3 images of just the
> flowers and post more.  Foliage (both*
> *upper & basal leaves, ideally showing lower surface as well), habit, 
> **habitat
> are really important.*
> *Without such images one is left trying to work out the picture of a
> jigsaw with lots of missing pieces.*
>
> *It was the standard thing to just take one or two photos focussing on the
> flowers only in the past (which is what*
> *I did when using slides and the requirement of changing lenses and a
> tripod) but modestly-priced second-hand*
> *compact digital cameras are now readily available with wonderful lenses
> for good close-ups and once into a*
> *routine it does not take long to take the requisite images.  Such a shame
> if missing images make it impossible for*
> *us to be sure which species a specimen belongs to or requires vastly more
> time and effort on our part.  Never easy*
> *to return to the site especially when trekking high in the mountains.*
>
> Nevertheless, I currently think that the best bet would be *D.kamaonense*
> - recorded from Kumaon to Central Nepal
> @ 3000-4300m.  'Flowers of the Himalaya' say common on open slopes in
> Nepal, so quite possible from this location.
>
> Perhaps Dr Rawat has come across *D.kamaonense* in Uttarakhand?
>
> Any other suggestions?
>
>
> Best Wishes,
>
>
> Chris Chadwell
>
>
> 81 Parlaunt Road
> SLOUGH
> SL3 8BE
> UK
>
> www.shpa.org.uk
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* J.M. Garg <[email protected]>
> *To:* D. S Rawat <[email protected]>
> *Cc:* chrischadwell261@btinternet. com <[email protected]>;
> efloraofindia <indiantreepix@googlegroups. com
> <[email protected]>>; Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]>;
> Nidhan Singh <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Thursday, 3 November 2016, 13:32
> *Subject:* Re: [efloraofindia:254590] Kailash-Mansarovar
> Yatra::Delphinium Sp for ID NSJ-OCT 16/24
>
> Thanks, Rawat ji for your keen eye.
>
> On 3 Nov 2016 2:15 pm, "D.S Rawat" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Some leaves obscurely visible in background indicate possibility of
> D.denudatum.
> eFI page on D.denudatum
> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/m---z/r/ranunculaceae/delphinium/delphinium-denudatum>
> .
>
> DSRawat Pantnagar
>
> Dr D.S.Rawat
> Department of Biological Sciences, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture &
> Technology Pantnagar-263 145 Uttarakhand, INDIA
> *eflorapantnagar* <https://sites.google.com/site/eflorapantnagar/home>
> displaying wild flora of Pantnagar
>
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 11:14 AM, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Forwarding again for Id assistance please.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: *Narendra Joshi* <[email protected]>
> Date: 23 October 2016 at 15:21
> Subject: [efloraofindia:254590] Kailash-Mansarovar Yatra::Delphinium Sp
> for ID NSJ-OCT 16/24
> To: indiantreepix <[email protected] m
> <[email protected]>>
>
>
> Dear Members,
>
> Delphinium Sp for ID. Photo taken near Gunji camp (Uttarakhand) Aug 2016,
> Altitude 10500 feet.
>
> --
> With Regards,
> Narendra Joshi
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "efloraofindia" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to indiantreepix+unsubscribe@goog legroups.com
> <[email protected]>.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] .
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/grou p/indiantreepix
> <https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/op tout
> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
>
>
>
> --
> With regards,
> J.M.Garg
> 'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna'
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1>
> Winner of Wipro-NFS Sparrow Awards 2014 for efloraofindia
> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/award-for-efloraofindia>.
> For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of Indian Flora,
> please visit/ join our Efloraofindia Google e-group
> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/indiantreepix> (largest in the
> world- around 2700 members & 2,40,000 messages on 31.3.16) or Efloraofindia
> website <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/> (with a species
> database of more than 11,000 species & 2,20,000 images).
> The whole world uses my Image Resource
> <http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg> of more than a
> thousand species & eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc.
> (arranged alphabetically & place-wise). You can also use them for free as
> per Creative Commons license attached with each image.
> Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common Birds of
> India'.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to