No responses (?)
Spondias genus seems to be rather uncommon.
Rashida ji Prashant ji Pravin ji and those who have seen a lot of Western
ghat flora what are your opinions?and of course Neil ji if he has not yet
left fot the trip of Northeast.

On 9 May 2010 12:29, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote:

> Resurfacing again for ID confirmation
>
> --
> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
> Retired  Associate Professor
> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ <http://people.du.ac.in/%7Esinghg45/>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Dinesh Valke <[email protected]>
> Date: Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:27 PM
> Subject: [efloraofindia:32434] DV - 14APR10 - 0138 :: ¿ Spondias acuminata
> ?
> To: efloraofindia <[email protected]>
>
>
> Dear friends,
> Could provide very scant information; the leafless tree in far distance
> attracted me due to its cream-coloured inflorescence.
> The photos too may not provide much clues to ID; yet hoping to get some
> info.
>
>
> Date/Time : April 14, 2010 at 1.38pm IST
> Location Place : Palghar Road (Ghat section)
>
> Altitude : 82 m
> GPS : 19°42'0.75"N, 72°49'17.99"E
>
> Habitat : wild
> Type : mixed deciduous forest
>
> Plant
> Habit : medium sized deciduous tree
> Height : 15 - 20 ft
> Length : - not a climber -
>
> Leaves
> Type : do not know
> Shape : do not know
> Size : do not know
>
> Inflorescence
> Type : panicle
> Size : can not guess
>
> Flowers
> Size : can not guess
> Colour : off-white
> Calyx : do not know
> Bracts : - no bracts -
>
> Fruits
> Type : do not know
> Shape : do not know
> Size : do not know
> Seeds : do not know
>
>
> Other Info
> Fragrance : do not know
> Pollinator : do not know
> Uses : do not know
>
>
>
>
> Thoughts exchanged between Satish (Pardeshi) ji and me at Google Buzz put
> here:
>
> x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
> x x x x x x x x
> satish pardeshi - first two pic look like that of *Spondias*!!!
>
> Dinesh Valke - yes !!! ... many thanks, Satish ji.
>
> satish pardeshi - Palghar is really nice place, i have been there a few
> times... the estuary, the beaches, the forest on the hills along the
> highway, the water bodies and the wadis of the local people for growing
> vegetables and fruit... all is really nice.
>
> Dinesh Valke - Satish ji ... on second thoughts ... slightly not confident
> about the plant being *S. pinnata*.
> Have got few views of *S. pinnata* seen at Yeoor Hills and near Revdanda
> ...
> http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=Spondiaspinnata&w=91314344%40N00&m=tags
>
> The inflorescence in my earlier views, seem to be wiry and relatively
> longer and much more branched.
>
> Your thoughts please.
>
> satish pardeshi - Yes Dinesh ji
> it is different from ur pics at flicr...i am pretty sure this is of *
> Spondias* species.
>
> Dinesh Valke - Cooke's Flora of Bombay describes two species: *S.
> mangifera* ( syn. of *S. pinnata* ) and lesser known *S. acuminata*.
>
> Key described:
> Panicle 12 - 15 in. long; stone rough ................................. *S.
> mangifera*
> Panicle 6 - 8 in. long; stone smooth .................................. *S.
> acuminata*
>
> Another difference found in the descriptions:
> *S. mangifera*:
> ... bark smooth, ash coloured, branches nearly horizontal;
> ... leaflets 3 - 5 pairs and a terminal one ...
>
> *S. acuminata*:
> ... bark smooth, olive-grey; branches spreading in all directions from
> erecto-patent above to divaricate below
> ... leaflets 5 - 8 pairs (and a terminal one) ...
>
> BUT the book mentions that existence of *S. acuminata* in Bombay
> Presidency is somewhat doubtful, ... Cooke had seen one imperfect specimen
> from the hills of Kanheri, not differing from *S. mangifera* !!
>
> Satish ji, do you think this plant to be *S. acuminata* OR yet some other
> species of *Spondias* ?
>
> Many thanks.
>
> x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
> x x x x x x x x
>
>
>
>
> Regards.
>
>
>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "efloraofindia" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<indiantreepix%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=en.
>
>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "efloraofindia" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<indiantreepix%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"efloraofindia" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=en.

Reply via email to