Thanks Ashutosh! That seems to be a good line of thought. There are many subspecies of* Urtica dioica *and there is varying opinion on Urtica angustifolia (*Urtica dioica* subsp. *angustifolia *being a synonym). With the given quality of pictures, I think one cannot go more precise than this. In this light, Saroj's guess also makes sense - the plant being a variant of Urtica dioica. An image showing female inflorescence of (supposedly) Urtica dioica on Wikipedia looks very similar to the plant here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urtica#/media/File:Urtica_dioica_(1).jpg Best wishes Tabish ------------------------------------------- <http://www.flowersofindia.net>www.flowersofindia.net The waterhole of flower lovers
On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 9:47 AM ashutoshsharma11sn < [email protected]> wrote: > Definitely Urticaceae > > This can be Urtica angustifolia which differs from Urtica dioica in having > sparser stinging hairs and comparitively shorter petioles. > Moreover it is much similar to U.dioica and also considered as eastern > geographical variant of U. dioica which also matches the location of plant > (Arunanchal Pradesh). > > > Best regards > Ashutosh Sharma > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/indiantreepix/jH1T-cq4sM4/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/97f49787-8c35-4510-a56a-22ed151514b2%40googlegroups.com > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CALTV20fKgnfeCKkUYgiNaXoxWpQDBCL%2B-JYd-e7OfJPbOLJX2Q%40mail.gmail.com.
