I think looks different from Uvaria concava as per
ATRP
<http://www.canbr.gov.au/cpbr/cd-keys/RFK7/key/RFK7/Media/Html/entities/Uvaria_concava.htm>
iNaturalist
<https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/960017-Uvaria-concava/browse_photos>
GBIF <https://www.gbif.org/species/3154255>

Also looks different from *Uvaria argentea* Bl. var. *bracteata *as per GBIF
<https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/gallery?taxon_key=3156920>- specimen
<https://api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/https%3A%2F%2Flive.staticflickr.com%2F65535%2F48262354742_3ff3cc3104_o_d.jpg>

On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 at 19:33, surajit koley <[email protected]>
wrote:

> The problem here is we do ot have entire leaf picture for character
> evaluation and other details like fruit size or view of the monocarps in
> different angles.
>
> .I have two suggestions here -
>
>    1. *Uvaria argentea* Bl. var. *bracteata* : It is *U. bracteata* Roxb.
>    of FLORA INDICA and Flora of British India. In Roxburgh's own words,*
>    "berries ..... when ripe of a rich yellow."* But the type species,
>    i.e., *U. argentea var. argentea, which is restricted to peninsular
>    Malaysia *features red or purple monocarps
>    2. *Uvaria concava* Teijsm. & Binn. : It is *U. narum* var.
>    *macrophylla* & *U. lurida* of Flora of British India. *monocarps
>    green turning orange or yellow at maturity..... young stipe and monocarp
>    with sparse indument, later subglabrous.*
>
> *So, I think the species in this thread is U. concava.*
>
> *Endnote : there is ample scope for mis-identification, because not much,
> or even adequate data is available from the submitted picture in this
> thread. *
>
> Thank you.
> Best regards,
> Surajit Koley
>
>
> On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 at 21:44, surajit koley <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Please, pardon me, Sawmliana ji, for mis-spelling your name.
>>
>> Thank you.
>> Best regards,
>> Surajit Koley
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 at 21:39, surajit koley <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Sir, to my understanding, typical *Uvaria concava* fruit would look
>>> like the one we have in our database -
>>> https://08511630493324166816.googlegroups.com/attach/bcba2a177696c320/DSC_0248-800.jpg?part=0.2&view=1&vt=ANaJVrGkQ4adOr3feT3MsZLoO_s5KR7Ai5HSCcveleC3RRP198esRVtL_2-H4DmCS7XLvrGJrPzwdbpS905ySpCroRHtpaliAyJGXGug5ng2B3wyJiGYplI
>>>
>>> @
>>> https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/a---l/a/annonaceae/uvaria/uvaria-concava
>>>
>>> Whereas
>>>
>>> the fruit (monocarps) in this discussion is neither glabrous, nor have
>>> small apicules. *So, I have much doubt.*
>>>
>>> Only favourable points are the *orange colour* of the monocarps and the
>>> "variation in floral and fruit characters" mentioned in the said 'paper'.
>>>
>>> *I will check the entire annonaceae and let you know.*
>>>
>>> Meanwhile, it would be very helpful if Swamliana ji could provide us his
>>> opinion and/or more detail.
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>> Best regards,
>>> Surajit Koley
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 at 14:57, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks, Surajit ji.
>>>> Pl. see if you can nail it down, from the paper I have sent you.
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 at 21:42, surajit koley <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Please check if it can be *Uvaria concava* of the* "Uvaria Paper"
>>>>> previously mentioned*,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Surajit Koley
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 at 17:13, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 at 11:25, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi, Sawmliana ji,
>>>>>>> Could you get it identified ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>>>>>>> From: <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 at 16:51
>>>>>>> Subject: [efloraofindia:183661] ID of climber
>>>>>>> To: <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dear sirs,
>>>>>>>               I am attaching herewith a photo of climber for your
>>>>>>> id. The fruits are edible. Place of collection : Tuirial, Aizawl dist.,
>>>>>>> Mizoram. Date : Unknown. Latitude : ca. 200 - 900 m.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> With regards,
>>>>>>> M Sawm Liana
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>> Groups "efloraofindia" group.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> With regards,
>>>>>>> J.M.Garg
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> With regards,
>>>>>> J.M.Garg
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> With regards,
>>>> J.M.Garg
>>>>
>>>

-- 
With regards,
J.M.Garg

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFAJPwSjnpFVZj5j2%2BOMBccWY%2B9xyN1mQO9gUwdr%3DxyUhw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to