At first, I did think that too, Sir.
Then I thought, "if this is *U. hamiltonii* then what is the other one at -
https://groups.google.com/g/indiantreepix/c/zWXWqY6TV24/m/XGFigk_f65cJ?";

Whatever little part of the leaf seen in the submitted picture, it seems to
be *obovate*.
Can this monocarps be called having tomentose epicarp? At most, I think
those are pubescence.
Is there much difference between this submitted picture and the first one
at "inaturalist (they too always update those ids, like us)" -
https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/960017-Uvaria-concava/browse_photos?

Thank you.
Best regards,
Surajit Koley


On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 at 17:46, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote:

> Can it be Uvaria hamiltonii as per GBIF
> <https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/gallery?taxon_key=3154362> - specimens
> one
> <https://api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/http%3A%2F%2Fmediaphoto.mnhn.fr%2Fmedia%2F1441303797685UYjl6u0kNCPO198B>
> , two
> <https://api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/https%3A%2F%2Fmedialib.naturalis.nl%2Ffile%2Fid%2FL.1770631%2Fformat%2Flarge>
>  and three
> <https://api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/http%3A%2F%2Fmediaphoto.mnhn.fr%2Fmedia%2F1443509695466Hqigth1MvsLVpYTw>
>  and four
> <https://api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/http%3A%2F%2Fmediaphoto.mnhn.fr%2Fmedia%2F1441303774929ntdVD65xxh7w3O1L>
>  ?
> To me appears some possibility.
>
> On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 at 17:42, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I think looks different from Uvaria concava as per
>> ATRP
>> <http://www.canbr.gov.au/cpbr/cd-keys/RFK7/key/RFK7/Media/Html/entities/Uvaria_concava.htm>
>> iNaturalist
>> <https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/960017-Uvaria-concava/browse_photos>
>> GBIF <https://www.gbif.org/species/3154255>
>>
>> Also looks different from *Uvaria argentea* Bl. var. *bracteata *as per
>> GBIF <https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/gallery?taxon_key=3156920>-
>> specimen
>> <https://api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/https%3A%2F%2Flive.staticflickr.com%2F65535%2F48262354742_3ff3cc3104_o_d.jpg>
>>
>> On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 at 19:33, surajit koley <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> The problem here is we do ot have entire leaf picture for character
>>> evaluation and other details like fruit size or view of the monocarps in
>>> different angles.
>>>
>>> .I have two suggestions here -
>>>
>>>    1. *Uvaria argentea* Bl. var. *bracteata* : It is *U. bracteata* Roxb.
>>>    of FLORA INDICA and Flora of British India. In Roxburgh's own words,*
>>>    "berries ..... when ripe of a rich yellow."* But the type species,
>>>    i.e., *U. argentea var. argentea, which is restricted to peninsular
>>>    Malaysia *features red or purple monocarps
>>>    2. *Uvaria concava* Teijsm. & Binn. : It is *U. narum* var.
>>>    *macrophylla* & *U. lurida* of Flora of British India. *monocarps
>>>    green turning orange or yellow at maturity..... young stipe and monocarp
>>>    with sparse indument, later subglabrous.*
>>>
>>> *So, I think the species in this thread is U. concava.*
>>>
>>> *Endnote : there is ample scope for mis-identification, because not
>>> much, or even adequate data is available from the submitted picture in this
>>> thread. *
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>> Best regards,
>>> Surajit Koley
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 at 21:44, surajit koley <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Please, pardon me, Sawmliana ji, for mis-spelling your name.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you.
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Surajit Koley
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 at 21:39, surajit koley <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Sir, to my understanding, typical *Uvaria concava* fruit would look
>>>>> like the one we have in our database -
>>>>> https://08511630493324166816.googlegroups.com/attach/bcba2a177696c320/DSC_0248-800.jpg?part=0.2&view=1&vt=ANaJVrGkQ4adOr3feT3MsZLoO_s5KR7Ai5HSCcveleC3RRP198esRVtL_2-H4DmCS7XLvrGJrPzwdbpS905ySpCroRHtpaliAyJGXGug5ng2B3wyJiGYplI
>>>>>
>>>>> @
>>>>> https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/a---l/a/annonaceae/uvaria/uvaria-concava
>>>>>
>>>>> Whereas
>>>>>
>>>>> the fruit (monocarps) in this discussion is neither glabrous, nor have
>>>>> small apicules. *So, I have much doubt.*
>>>>>
>>>>> Only favourable points are the *orange colour* of the monocarps and
>>>>> the "variation in floral and fruit characters" mentioned in the said
>>>>> 'paper'.
>>>>>
>>>>> *I will check the entire annonaceae and let you know.*
>>>>>
>>>>> Meanwhile, it would be very helpful if Swamliana ji could provide us
>>>>> his opinion and/or more detail.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Surajit Koley
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 at 14:57, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks, Surajit ji.
>>>>>> Pl. see if you can nail it down, from the paper I have sent you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 at 21:42, surajit koley <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please check if it can be *Uvaria concava* of the* "Uvaria Paper"
>>>>>>> previously mentioned*,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>> Surajit Koley
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 at 17:13, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 at 11:25, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi, Sawmliana ji,
>>>>>>>>> Could you get it identified ?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>>>>>>>>> From: <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 at 16:51
>>>>>>>>> Subject: [efloraofindia:183661] ID of climber
>>>>>>>>> To: <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dear sirs,
>>>>>>>>>               I am attaching herewith a photo of climber for your
>>>>>>>>> id. The fruits are edible. Place of collection : Tuirial, Aizawl 
>>>>>>>>> dist.,
>>>>>>>>> Mizoram. Date : Unknown. Latitude : ca. 200 - 900 m.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> With regards,
>>>>>>>>> M Sawm Liana
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>>>> Groups "efloraofindia" group.
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to
>>>>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> With regards,
>>>>>>>>> J.M.Garg
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> With regards,
>>>>>>>> J.M.Garg
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> With regards,
>>>>>> J.M.Garg
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>> --
>> With regards,
>> J.M.Garg
>>
>
>
> --
> With regards,
> J.M.Garg
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAMV_mc0yrzYSY5FLNyrp%2BZgoSOrRoRxxiRzsiwcWgqpY8gtAeQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to