Can it be Uvaria hamiltonii as per GBIF <https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/gallery?taxon_key=3154362> - specimens one <https://api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/http%3A%2F%2Fmediaphoto.mnhn.fr%2Fmedia%2F1441303797685UYjl6u0kNCPO198B> , two <https://api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/https%3A%2F%2Fmedialib.naturalis.nl%2Ffile%2Fid%2FL.1770631%2Fformat%2Flarge> and three <https://api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/http%3A%2F%2Fmediaphoto.mnhn.fr%2Fmedia%2F1443509695466Hqigth1MvsLVpYTw> and four <https://api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/http%3A%2F%2Fmediaphoto.mnhn.fr%2Fmedia%2F1441303774929ntdVD65xxh7w3O1L> ? To me appears some possibility.
On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 at 17:42, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: > I think looks different from Uvaria concava as per > ATRP > <http://www.canbr.gov.au/cpbr/cd-keys/RFK7/key/RFK7/Media/Html/entities/Uvaria_concava.htm> > iNaturalist > <https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/960017-Uvaria-concava/browse_photos> > GBIF <https://www.gbif.org/species/3154255> > > Also looks different from *Uvaria argentea* Bl. var. *bracteata *as per > GBIF <https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/gallery?taxon_key=3156920>- specimen > <https://api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/https%3A%2F%2Flive.staticflickr.com%2F65535%2F48262354742_3ff3cc3104_o_d.jpg> > > On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 at 19:33, surajit koley <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> The problem here is we do ot have entire leaf picture for character >> evaluation and other details like fruit size or view of the monocarps in >> different angles. >> >> .I have two suggestions here - >> >> 1. *Uvaria argentea* Bl. var. *bracteata* : It is *U. bracteata* Roxb. >> of FLORA INDICA and Flora of British India. In Roxburgh's own words,* >> "berries ..... when ripe of a rich yellow."* But the type species, >> i.e., *U. argentea var. argentea, which is restricted to peninsular >> Malaysia *features red or purple monocarps >> 2. *Uvaria concava* Teijsm. & Binn. : It is *U. narum* var. >> *macrophylla* & *U. lurida* of Flora of British India. *monocarps >> green turning orange or yellow at maturity..... young stipe and monocarp >> with sparse indument, later subglabrous.* >> >> *So, I think the species in this thread is U. concava.* >> >> *Endnote : there is ample scope for mis-identification, because not much, >> or even adequate data is available from the submitted picture in this >> thread. * >> >> Thank you. >> Best regards, >> Surajit Koley >> >> >> On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 at 21:44, surajit koley < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Please, pardon me, Sawmliana ji, for mis-spelling your name. >>> >>> Thank you. >>> Best regards, >>> Surajit Koley >>> >>> >>> On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 at 21:39, surajit koley < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Sir, to my understanding, typical *Uvaria concava* fruit would look >>>> like the one we have in our database - >>>> https://08511630493324166816.googlegroups.com/attach/bcba2a177696c320/DSC_0248-800.jpg?part=0.2&view=1&vt=ANaJVrGkQ4adOr3feT3MsZLoO_s5KR7Ai5HSCcveleC3RRP198esRVtL_2-H4DmCS7XLvrGJrPzwdbpS905ySpCroRHtpaliAyJGXGug5ng2B3wyJiGYplI >>>> >>>> @ >>>> https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/a---l/a/annonaceae/uvaria/uvaria-concava >>>> >>>> Whereas >>>> >>>> the fruit (monocarps) in this discussion is neither glabrous, nor have >>>> small apicules. *So, I have much doubt.* >>>> >>>> Only favourable points are the *orange colour* of the monocarps and >>>> the "variation in floral and fruit characters" mentioned in the said >>>> 'paper'. >>>> >>>> *I will check the entire annonaceae and let you know.* >>>> >>>> Meanwhile, it would be very helpful if Swamliana ji could provide us >>>> his opinion and/or more detail. >>>> >>>> Thank you. >>>> Best regards, >>>> Surajit Koley >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 at 14:57, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thanks, Surajit ji. >>>>> Pl. see if you can nail it down, from the paper I have sent you. >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 at 21:42, surajit koley < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Please check if it can be *Uvaria concava* of the* "Uvaria Paper" >>>>>> previously mentioned*, >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>> Surajit Koley >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 at 17:13, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 at 11:25, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi, Sawmliana ji, >>>>>>>> Could you get it identified ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>>>>>>> From: <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 at 16:51 >>>>>>>> Subject: [efloraofindia:183661] ID of climber >>>>>>>> To: <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Dear sirs, >>>>>>>> I am attaching herewith a photo of climber for your >>>>>>>> id. The fruits are edible. Place of collection : Tuirial, Aizawl dist., >>>>>>>> Mizoram. Date : Unknown. Latitude : ca. 200 - 900 m. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> With regards, >>>>>>>> M Sawm Liana >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>>> Groups "efloraofindia" group. >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. >>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> With regards, >>>>>>>> J.M.Garg >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> With regards, >>>>>>> J.M.Garg >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> With regards, >>>>> J.M.Garg >>>>> >>>> > > -- > With regards, > J.M.Garg > -- With regards, J.M.Garg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFCxjHC7A7LNdnJ6RwXZ9GfRB5Nx%3Ds6Wtg5azP%3Dr8QuFqQ%40mail.gmail.com.
