Rashida ji Kindly be more elaborate about the two separate entries at KEW that you have mentioned. Perhaps then we will be able to discuss it further.
-- Dr. Gurcharan Singh Retired Associate Professor SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Dinesh Valke <[email protected]>wrote: > Dear friends, ... am attempting to dig into this query; but, am afraid will > end up with more queries :) > Resurfacing this thread for attention of those who are familiar with * > Stereospermum* plants. > > Regards. > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Rashida Atthar > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Sorry for the delayed response but Kew has separate entry for both of S. >> personatum Hassk. Will have to discuss this once Dr. Gurcharan ji is back. >> >> regards, >> Rashida. >> >> >> On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Satish Phadke <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Thanks Gurcharan ji for going into such details. >>> We have with us very limited literature for study. >>> >>> >>> On 13 June 2010 07:21, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Rashida ji >>>> I am slightly confused. You are writing that "Dr. Almeida's flora has >>>> put S. colais (Buch. - Ham ex Dillw.) as the earlier name for S. >>>> personatum (Hassk,)" so logically former should be the correct name and not >>>> the latter that you have put in your subject line. According to GRIN also >>>> S. >>>> colais (Buch.-Ham. ex Dillw.) Mabb. is the correct name. There are two >>>> things to support it, firstly Mabberly has made his combination in 1978, >>>> whereas as Chatterjee made his in 1948, former is more recent. Secondly >>>> basionym Bignonia colais (1837) antedates Dipterosperma personatum Hassk. >>>> (1842), and hence if the two species are to be treated as synonyms, S. >>>> colais is preferred choice as correct name. >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh >>>> Retired Associate Professor >>>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 >>>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. >>>> Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 >>>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ <http://people.du.ac.in/%7Esinghg45/> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 9:33 PM, Rashida Atthar < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Prashant ji, Dr. Almeida's flora has put S. colais (Buch. - Ham ex >>>>> Dillw.) as the earlier name for S. personatum (Hassk,) Chatterjee. The >>>>> caudate leaves and all morphological characteristics of flowers match very >>>>> well with this. >>>>> >>>>> There is one more species S. personatum ( Hassk.) Chatterjee var. >>>>> angustifolia (Haines) Santisukh, this one had earliar name S. colais >>>>> (Buch.-Ham. ex Dillw.) Mabberley var. angustifolia (Haines). This one we >>>>> do >>>>> not see, the leaflets are acuminate not caudate, and corola is not wooly >>>>> at >>>>> base. So what we see generally see is S. personatum (Hassk.) Chatterjee. >>>>> Hope this clarifies your query. >>>>> >>>>> regards, >>>>> Rashida. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 9:07 PM, Prashant awale <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Dear Rashida ji, >>>>>> Nice set of photos. These photographs and one uploaded by me tallies >>>>>> well. Both has to be same sp. Do u have some comparison between S. >>>>>> personatum and S. colais so that ID can be resolved. >>>>>> regards >>>>>> Prashant >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Rashida Atthar < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Saw the flowering of Stereospermum personatum (Hassk.) Chatterjee at >>>>>>> the south end of the national park in Mumbai on 11 June, '10. >>>>>>> along with the capsules. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> regards, >>>>>>> Rashida. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "efloraofindia" group. >>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>>> [email protected]<indiantreepix%[email protected]> >>>>>>> . >>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=en. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "efloraofindia" group. >>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>> [email protected]<indiantreepix%[email protected]> >>>>> . >>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=en. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "efloraofindia" group. >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> [email protected]<indiantreepix%[email protected]> >>>> . >>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=en. >>>> >>> >>> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "efloraofindia" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]<indiantreepix%[email protected]> >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=en. >> > >
