Neither POWO nor CoL gives distribution of Sibbaldia parviflora or S. procumbens in India as per https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:741483-1 http://www.catalogueoflife.org/annual-checklist/2019/details/species/id/3e0799e2a5ad2c0e808ae421547fb7b3
https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:741489-1 http://www.catalogueoflife.org/annual-checklist/2019/details/species/id/61f95f067ee23d05df4aba57b91535c5 It appears there is something more complex in this. In view, I am keeping observations from Valley of Flowers at *Sibbaldia cuneata* Hornem. ex Kuntze <https://efloraofindia.com/2011/03/29/sibbaldia-cuneata/> only, for the time being. I also do not find any substantial difference from other observations from Himachal and J & K. On Wed, 16 Sept 2015 at 11:23, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > The small alpine Potentilla described as Potentilla sibbaldii Haller.f. in > Flora of British India has gone either as Sibbaldia procumbens var. > procumbens (eFlora Pakistan; eFlora China) or S. cuneata Hornem ex Kuntze. > The Plant list treats P. sibbaldii described in FBI (synonym of Sibbaldia > parviflora Willd.) as distinct from P. sibbaldii of Haller.f. (synonym of > S. procumbens) > We thus have three plants to account for, luckily two are described in > eFlora of China. > Sibbaldia cuneata: Stems erect or ascending, epicalyx equalling calyx; > petals equalling or longer than calyx > > Sibbaldia procumbens var. procumbens: Stems prostrate or ascending; > epicalyx much shorter than calyx; petals shorter than sepals. > > Sibbaldia parviflora: Much like S. procumbens but densely downy and > appearing Grey > > http://encyclopaedia.alpinegardensociety.net/plants/Sibbaldia/parviflora > > There are two plants uploaded in our database. One by me as S. procumbens > var. procumbens. This should be S. cuneata > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/indiantreepix/Sibbaldia$20procumbens/indiantreepix/_b03-1mHgCI/YEjGF5NNGAAJ > > The second by Dinesh ji uploaded as Sibbaldia cuneata should be S. > parviflora > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/indiantreepix/Sibbaldia$20procumbens/indiantreepix/_b03-1mHgCI/YEjGF5NNGAAJ > > Prashant ji has perhaps correctly identified his plant as S. parviflora > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/indiantreepix/Sibbaldia$20parviflora/indiantreepix/5WZGkGM5IG0/LKL1NxdUy2YJ > > Your comments please > > : > > > Dr. Gurcharan Singh > Retired Associate Professor > SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 > Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. > Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 > http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/ > http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "efloraofindia" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- With regards, J.M.Garg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFDtNEgq%3DB5FFV86FiWkkcTNSCXg7M-YH42pc1_huaR5pg%40mail.gmail.com.
