Thanks, Saroj ji. These records are much older (30 to 40 years old) compared to those of POWO, CoL, eFloras. Even now BSI Flora of India offers only a checklist (I think of 1993). Synonyms at Sibbaldia cuneata <https://efloraindia.bsi.gov.in/eFlora/speciesDesc_PCL.action?species_id=20528> and Sibbaldia parviflora <https://efloraindia.bsi.gov.in/eFlora/speciesDesc_PCL.action?species_id=20543> are in conflict with those in eFloras and POWO and CoL.
On Wed, 26 Jan 2022 at 21:36, Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> wrote: > Some more links : > https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjOhc3T48_1AhXiIqYKHceoBwgQFnoECAIQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ias.ac.in%2Farticle%2Ffulltext%2Fplnt%2F090%2F03%2F0253-0272&usg=AOvVaw3eYxIJZtAS3M2WDK8hF521 > > https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjOhc3T48_1AhXiIqYKHceoBwgQFnoECBoQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Findiabiodiversity.org%2Fspecies%2Fshow%2F245574&usg=AOvVaw0qVXl_kQWCqVX2TnpIizvy > > https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjOhc3T48_1AhXiIqYKHceoBwgQFnoECAQQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fefloraindia.bsi.gov.in%2FeFlora%2FspeciesList_PCL.action%3FresultType%3DgenusWise%26parent_Id%3D20322%26parent_Name%3Dsibbaldia&usg=AOvVaw1gTsavCaMoVVt7t4AztGaP > > https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjOhc3T48_1AhXiIqYKHceoBwgQFnoECCMQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fplants.jstor.org%2Fstable%2Fhistory%2F10.5555%2Fal.ap.specimen.k000467309&usg=AOvVaw3mcZm1spKecSEY5vvhuBLl > > https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjOhc3T48_1AhXiIqYKHceoBwgQFnoECCIQAQ&url=http%3A%2F%2Fflora-peninsula-indica.ces.iisc.ac.in%2Fpan%2Fherbsheet.php%3Fid%3D1325%26cat%3D10&usg=AOvVaw333VStgMX5fEzaqZr6CvqZ > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 9:39 PM Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I agree with Dinesh Ji and that is same will all sites. >> They miss a lot ! >> >> Thank you. >> >> Saroj Kasaju >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 9:37 PM Dinesh Valke <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hello garg ji, >>> Distribution at POWO, many times, is not as per what we observe. >>> Regards. >>> Dinesh >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 9:04 PM Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Please have a look at he GBIF link : >>>> https://www.gbif.org/species/3025060 ! >>>> >>>> Thank you. >>>> >>>> Saroj Kasaju >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 9:01 PM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Neither POWO nor CoL gives distribution of Sibbaldia parviflora or S. >>>>> procumbens >>>>> in India as per >>>>> https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:741483-1 >>>>> >>>>> http://www.catalogueoflife.org/annual-checklist/2019/details/species/id/3e0799e2a5ad2c0e808ae421547fb7b3 >>>>> >>>>> https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:741489-1 >>>>> >>>>> http://www.catalogueoflife.org/annual-checklist/2019/details/species/id/61f95f067ee23d05df4aba57b91535c5 >>>>> >>>>> It appears there is something more complex in this. >>>>> In view, I am keeping observations from Valley of Flowers at >>>>> *Sibbaldia cuneata* Hornem. ex Kuntze >>>>> <https://efloraofindia.com/2011/03/29/sibbaldia-cuneata/> only, for >>>>> the time being. I also do not find any substantial difference from other >>>>> observations from Himachal and J & K. >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, 16 Sept 2015 at 11:23, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> The small alpine Potentilla described as Potentilla sibbaldii >>>>>> Haller.f. in Flora of British India has gone either as Sibbaldia >>>>>> procumbens >>>>>> var. procumbens (eFlora Pakistan; eFlora China) or S. cuneata Hornem ex >>>>>> Kuntze. The Plant list treats P. sibbaldii described in FBI (synonym of >>>>>> Sibbaldia parviflora Willd.) as distinct from P. sibbaldii of Haller.f. >>>>>> (synonym of S. procumbens) >>>>>> We thus have three plants to account for, luckily two are described >>>>>> in eFlora of China. >>>>>> Sibbaldia cuneata: Stems erect or ascending, epicalyx equalling >>>>>> calyx; petals equalling or longer than calyx >>>>>> >>>>>> Sibbaldia procumbens var. procumbens: Stems prostrate or ascending; >>>>>> epicalyx much shorter than calyx; petals shorter than sepals. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sibbaldia parviflora: Much like S. procumbens but densely downy and >>>>>> appearing Grey >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> http://encyclopaedia.alpinegardensociety.net/plants/Sibbaldia/parviflora >>>>>> >>>>>> There are two plants uploaded in our database. One by me as S. >>>>>> procumbens var. procumbens. This should be S. cuneata >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/indiantreepix/Sibbaldia$20procumbens/indiantreepix/_b03-1mHgCI/YEjGF5NNGAAJ >>>>>> >>>>>> The second by Dinesh ji uploaded as Sibbaldia cuneata should be S. >>>>>> parviflora >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/indiantreepix/Sibbaldia$20procumbens/indiantreepix/_b03-1mHgCI/YEjGF5NNGAAJ >>>>>> >>>>>> Prashant ji has perhaps correctly identified his plant as S. >>>>>> parviflora >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/indiantreepix/Sibbaldia$20parviflora/indiantreepix/5WZGkGM5IG0/LKL1NxdUy2YJ >>>>>> >>>>>> Your comments please >>>>>> >>>>>> : >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh >>>>>> Retired Associate Professor >>>>>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 >>>>>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. >>>>>> Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 >>>>>> http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/ >>>>>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "efloraofindia" group. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. >>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> With regards, >>>>> J.M.Garg >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "efloraofindia" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit >>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFDtNEgq%3DB5FFV86FiWkkcTNSCXg7M-YH42pc1_huaR5pg%40mail.gmail.com >>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFDtNEgq%3DB5FFV86FiWkkcTNSCXg7M-YH42pc1_huaR5pg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>> . >>>>> >>>> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "efloraofindia" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAEf%3DytS9-gcxsb4EujZzTR4bf74kmRTW1pSpLcqOqyWSkhL%2BxQ%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAEf%3DytS9-gcxsb4EujZzTR4bf74kmRTW1pSpLcqOqyWSkhL%2BxQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- With regards, J.M.Garg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFDdKh7X7Zud9VZ_EMNuUKQMmaBP0-06jemzFM24sXEiPw%40mail.gmail.com.
