Thanks a lot, Tapas ji On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 at 20:01, Tapas Chakrabarty <[email protected]> wrote:
> Garg ji, > Such a report could be based on misidentification only. Without flowers or > fruits we can distinguish A. reticulata, identifiable by the prominent > minor venation of leaves on both surfaces of leaves. But here we can see > obscure minor venation of the leaves, characteristic of A. longipes. > Moreover, true A. reticulata is confined to the Khasi hills and reports > outside Meghalaya might be misidentifications, in my opinion. > The situation can be clarified decisively only when the flowers and fruits > are made available. > > With regards, > Tapas > > On Mon, 20 Mar 2023, 17:42 J.M. Garg, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks, Tapas ji. >> There is only one specimen >> <https://www.gbif.org/tools/zoom/simple.html?src=//api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/https%3A%2F%2Fmedialib.naturalis.nl%2Ffile%2Fid%2FL.1790333%2Fformat%2Flarge> >> of this in GBIF <https://www.gbif.org/species/4177419> and it looks >> different to me. >> *Actinodaphne reticulata* Meisn. has been reported in the Checklist of >> Nepal. >> >> >> On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 at 17:35, Tapas Chakrabarty <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I beg to differ. I think the samples posted by Saroj ji should belong to >>> Actinodaphne longipes Kosterm. which is possibly unrecorded for Nepal. >>> Anyway, for fomally reporting the occurrence of the species from Nepal, we >>> need flowering or fruiting material and herbarium specimens. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Tapas >>> >>> On Mon, 20 Mar 2023, 17:02 Saroj Kasaju, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Thank you Mr. Garg ! >>>> >>>> Saroj Kasaju >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 4:55 PM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I also feel more close to Actinodaphne reticulata Meisn. as per GBIF >>>>> <https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/gallery?taxon_key=4176958> specimens >>>>> (one >>>>> <https://www.gbif.org/tools/zoom/simple.html?src=//api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/http%3A%2F%2Fmediaphoto.mnhn.fr%2Fmedia%2F1441303198529LMrNzbkxauXyBV29>, >>>>> two >>>>> <https://www.gbif.org/tools/zoom/simple.html?src=//api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/http%3A%2F%2Fn2t.net%2Fark%3A%2F65665%2Fm38e5a0276-4972-4d2e-ae19-d881c1561f61>, >>>>> three >>>>> <https://www.gbif.org/tools/zoom/simple.html?src=//api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/https%3A%2F%2Fquod.lib.umich.edu%2Fcgi%2Fi%2Fimage%2Fapi%2Fimage%2Fherb00ic%3A1500468%3AMICH-V-1500468%2Ffull%2Fres%3A0%2F0%2Fnative.jpg> >>>>> ). >>>>> Looks different from Actinodaphne sikkimensis Meisn. as per efi page >>>>> <https://efloraofindia.com/2018/07/14/actinodaphne-sikkimensis/> and >>>>> GBIF <https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/gallery?taxon_key=4176753> >>>>> specimens. >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, 17 Mar 2023 at 13:13, Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Yes, it mentioned Phulchoki also. However, the tree had fallen and >>>>>> I am not sure If I can >>>>>> find another tree to follow up for the flowering and fruiting ! >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>> >>>>>> Saroj Kasaju >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 1:18 PM Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> OK Tapas Da! >>>>>>> I am not Da but a junior😉! >>>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Saroj Kasaju >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 1:15 PM Tapas Chakrabarty < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Saroj da, >>>>>>>> Would you please read our publication on Actinodaphne and point out >>>>>>>> where we erred? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sincere regards, >>>>>>>> Tapas >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, 17 Mar 2023, 12:49 Saroj Kasaju, <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Dear Tapas Da ! >>>>>>>>> A. sikkimensis is not yet recorded from Kathmandu Valley, however, >>>>>>>>> A. reticulata is recorded in >>>>>>>>> many localities in the valley and particularly. Phulchoki ! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Saroj Kasaju >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 12:46 PM Tapas Chakrabarty < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The whorled leaves and the terminal perulate buds indeed point to >>>>>>>>>> Actinodaphne. However, in my opinion, A. reticulata is best treated >>>>>>>>>> as a >>>>>>>>>> rare endemic confined to the Khasi hills in Meghalaya. I think the >>>>>>>>>> present >>>>>>>>>> images should be compared with A. sikkimensis. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 17 Mar 2023, 12:12 Saroj Kasaju, <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> *Actinodaphne reticulata *Meisn. ?? Herbarium image from nearby >>>>>>>>>>> location. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=https%3A%2F%2Fidentify.plantnet.org%2Fru%2Fthe-plant-list%2Fspecies%2FActinodaphne%2520longipes%2520Kosterm.%2Fdata&psig=AOvVaw2W3qn5h8fLOEwsMm-T0TOo&ust=1679121425740000&source=images&cd=vfe&ved=0CBAQjRxqFwoTCOCW8PKs4v0CFQAAAAAdAAAAABAE >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Saroj Kasaju >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 12:08 PM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, appears to be from lauraceae. >>>>>>>>>>>> Can it be some Actinodaphne >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://efloraofindia.com/2011/02/01/actinodaphne/> species. >>>>>>>>>>>> I tried as per the Checklist of Nepal >>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=110&taxon_id=100442>, >>>>>>>>>>>> but could not find any match. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>>>>>>>>>>> From: Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>> Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 at 13:48 >>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: SK 3703 15 March 2023 >>>>>>>>>>>> To: efloraindia <[email protected]>, J.M. Garg < >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>, Tapas Chakrabarty <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> *Dear Members,Location: Kathmandu Valley, NepalDate: 11 March >>>>>>>>>>>> 2023Altitude: 2418m.Habitat : Wild * >>>>>>>>>>>> Lauraceae ?? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Saroj Kasaju >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> With regards, >>>>>>>>>>>> J.M.Garg >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> With regards, >>>>> J.M.Garg >>>>> >>>> >> >> -- >> With regards, >> J.M.Garg >> > -- With regards, J.M.Garg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "eFloraofIndia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFDkqEZ9zm04P3b6%3DfQ8f5G55KCZDF5Cqz-c5tfgjb0sGQ%40mail.gmail.com.
